* Josh Stone:
> On 2/24/20 10:11 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> If we add this to nss_nis.spec:
>>
>> %ifarch x86_64
>> Recommends: (nss_nis(x86-32) if glibc(x86-32))
>> %endif
>>
>> then when the user installs nss_nis after glibc.i686, they will get both
>> packages, as expected.
>>
>> Unfortunately, it does not work if nss_nis.x86_64 is installed first.
>> Is there a way to fix this aspect?
>
> Would you be willing to add a similar rule in glibc.spec?
>
> %ifarch %{ix86}
> Recommends: (nss_nis(x86-32) if nss_nis(x86-64))
> %endif
Hmm. We'd have to do this for all NSS modules and PAM modules, which is
an open-ended list. I'm not sure the limitation (regarding late
installation of glibc.i686) is worth it.
DNF seems to do the right thing if glibc.i686 and nss_nis are installed
in the same transaction, so presumably kickstart files would work as
expected.
(nss_nis is no longer built from the glibc sources, sorry if this caused
confusion.)
Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
