Thanks for the answer.
I make a comment in the bug.
El mar., 25 feb. 2020 a las 16:42, Scott Talbert (<swt@xxxxxxxxxx>) escribió:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Eduard Lucena wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I'm writing this here, because I don't know of any other place, so if there
> is another place to report it, I'll listen to go there.
>
> I'm trying to install the package: python3-i3ipc
>
> $ sudo dnf info python3-i3ipc
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:42 ago on Tue 25 Feb 2020 02:18:22 PM
> -03.
> Available Packages
> Name : python3-i3ipc
> Version : 1.5.1
> Release : 4.fc31
> Architecture : noarch
> Size : 29 k
> Source : python-i3ipc-1.5.1-4.fc31.src.rpm
> Repository : fedora
> Summary : An improved Python library to control i3wm
> URL : https://github.com/acrisci/i3ipc-python
> License : BSD
> Description :
> : i3's interprocess communication (or ipc) is the interface
> i3wm uses to receive
> : commands from client applications such as i3-msg. It also
> features
> : a publish/subscribe mechanism for notifying interested
> parties of window
> : manager events.
> :
> : i3ipc-python is a Python library for controlling the window
> manager. This
> : project is intended to be useful for general scripting, and
> for applications
> : that interact with the window manager like status line
> generators, notification
> : daemons, and pagers.
>
>
> But I get the following error:
>
> $ sudo dnf install python3-i3ipc
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:09 ago on Tue 25 Feb 2020 02:18:22 PM
> -03.
> Error:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides python3.7dist(enum-compat) needed by
> python3-i3ipc-1.5.1-4.fc31.noarch
> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>
> I'm reporting it, because the package is coming from the Fedora repo, not
> from a 3rd party repos, so I assume that we should provide it and should be
> installable.
>
>
> If this is the wrong place, please guide me to the right place. Thanks a lot
> for your efforts and time to keep fedora great.
Usually the best place to report a bug about a specific package is
bugzilla. It appears this bug has already been reported. However, it has
been open for a few months without any response:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770839
Scott
--
Eduard Lucena
Móvil: +56962318010
GNU/Linux User #589060
Ubuntu User #8749
Móvil: +56962318010
GNU/Linux User #589060
Ubuntu User #8749
Fedora Marketing Representative
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx