Re: Non installable package on F31: python3-i3ipc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the answer.

I make a comment in the bug.

El mar., 25 feb. 2020 a las 16:42, Scott Talbert (<swt@xxxxxxxxxx>) escribió:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Eduard Lucena wrote:

> Hello team,
>
> I'm writing this here, because I don't know of any other place, so if there
> is another place to report it, I'll listen to go there.
>
> I'm trying to install the package: python3-i3ipc
>
> $ sudo dnf info python3-i3ipc
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:42 ago on Tue 25 Feb 2020 02:18:22 PM
> -03.
> Available Packages
> Name         : python3-i3ipc
> Version      : 1.5.1
> Release      : 4.fc31
> Architecture : noarch
> Size         : 29 k
> Source       : python-i3ipc-1.5.1-4.fc31.src.rpm
> Repository   : fedora
> Summary      : An improved Python library to control i3wm
> URL          : https://github.com/acrisci/i3ipc-python
> License      : BSD
> Description  :
>              : i3's interprocess communication (or ipc) is the interface
> i3wm uses to receive
>              : commands from client applications such as i3-msg. It also
> features
>              : a publish/subscribe mechanism for notifying interested
> parties of window
>              : manager events.
>              :
>              : i3ipc-python is a Python library for controlling the window
> manager. This
>              : project is intended to be useful for general scripting, and
> for applications
>              : that interact with the window manager like status line
> generators, notification
>              : daemons, and pagers.
>
>
> But I get the following error:
>
> $ sudo dnf install python3-i3ipc
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:09 ago on Tue 25 Feb 2020 02:18:22 PM
> -03.
> Error:
>  Problem: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides python3.7dist(enum-compat) needed by
> python3-i3ipc-1.5.1-4.fc31.noarch
> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>
> I'm reporting it, because the package is coming from the Fedora repo, not
> from a 3rd party repos, so I assume that we should provide it and should be
> installable.
>
>
> If this is the wrong place, please guide me to the right place. Thanks a lot
> for your efforts and time to keep fedora great.

Usually the best place to report a bug about a specific package is
bugzilla.  It appears this bug has already been reported.  However, it has
been open for a few months without any response:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770839

Scott


--
Eduard Lucena
Móvil: +56962318010
GNU/Linux User #589060
Ubuntu User #8749
Fedora Marketing Representative
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux