On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Dakota Williams <raineforest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > > > > On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote: > > > >> I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have > >> prepared - let us not duplicate the work: > >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1 > >> I have rebuilt all asio's dependencies and only encountered issues with > >> abiword and OpenSceneGraph - both were complaining about error not being > >> a member of asio::placeholders. Same issues were found by gentoo, I have > >> linked the relevant bug reports in the PR. Is this something you would > >> be able to advise about? I am happy to share full build logs if needed. > > > > I haven't personally looked at asio 1.14.0 yet so I don't have the > > solution off the top of my head. These are the type of issues I > > normally deal with in upstream development. > > > > From a strategic perspective, I feel it is most efficient to try and > > coordinate with the upstreams and other distributions so that everybody > > is supporting the same asio in each of the major distributions. > > > > In any C++ library, there are small API changes from time to time > > leading to the type of problem you describe. > > > > If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2 > > from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of issues in asio 1.14.0. Even > > if you patch for the issue, it may be completely untested upstream. > > That is why it is so vital to resolve the Debian/Ubuntu lag. > > > > Is there a convenient way for upstreams to make CI builds on the latest > > Fedora rawhide in parallel with our travis-ci Ubuntu builds? > > > >> Please also note that I have checked both fale and uwog's recent > >> activity with fedora-active-user and neither seem to have been active > >> lately. > > > > Thanks for this feedback. Dakota, do you want to be promoted to admin > > on asio? > > > > Is either of you happy to be co-maintainer of resiprocate with me? I > > opened an issue to unretire it. I do upstream releases and I run the > > latest version for fedrtc.org (using CentOS/EPEL) so it is important for > > me that it supports Fedora and any Fedora issues are given the attention > > they deserve during the release process. > > > Sure, admin is ok with me. Co-maintainer of resiprocate would also be > something I'd be willing to take on. It's been a couple of weeks now, and I don't see "raineforest" listed as admin for asio[1]. Can you please add him as requested? Also, resiprocate[2] was retired three months ago after being orphaned for 6 weeks for failing to build for Fedora 31[3]. It will need to go through a whole new review process *after* asio is updated. [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio [2]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/resiprocate [3]: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8917#comment-610267 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
