Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pocock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 15/03/2020 13:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Dakota Williams
> <raineforest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/6/20 1:21 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/03/2020 21:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would like to take this opportunity to remind about the PR that I have
>>>> prepared - let us not duplicate the work:
>>>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio/pull-request/1
>>>> I have rebuilt all asio's dependencies and only encountered issues with
>>>> abiword and OpenSceneGraph - both were complaining about error not being
>>>> a member of asio::placeholders. Same issues were found by gentoo, I have
>>>> linked the relevant bug reports in the PR. Is this something you would
>>>> be able to advise about? I am happy to share full build logs if needed.
>>>
>>> I haven't personally looked at asio 1.14.0 yet so I don't have the
>>> solution off the top of my head.  These are the type of issues I
>>> normally deal with in upstream development.
>>>
>>>  From a strategic perspective, I feel it is most efficient to try and
>>> coordinate with the upstreams and other distributions so that everybody
>>> is supporting the same asio in each of the major distributions.
>>>
>>> In any C++ library, there are small API changes from time to time
>>> leading to the type of problem you describe.
>>>
>>> If upstreams are using travis-ci, we are testing against version 1.12.2
>>> from Debian/Ubuntu and may not be aware of issues in asio 1.14.0.  Even
>>> if you patch for the issue, it may be completely untested upstream.
>>> That is why it is so vital to resolve the Debian/Ubuntu lag.
>>>
>>> Is there a convenient way for upstreams to make CI builds on the latest
>>> Fedora rawhide in parallel with our travis-ci Ubuntu builds?
>>>
>>>> Please also note that I have checked both fale and uwog's recent
>>>> activity with fedora-active-user and neither seem to have been active
>>>> lately.
>>>
>>> Thanks for this feedback.  Dakota, do you want to be promoted to admin
>>> on asio?
>>>
>>> Is either of you happy to be co-maintainer of resiprocate with me?  I
>>> opened an issue to unretire it.  I do upstream releases and I run the
>>> latest version for fedrtc.org (using CentOS/EPEL) so it is important for
>>> me that it supports Fedora and any Fedora issues are given the attention
>>> they deserve during the release process.
>>
>>
>> Sure, admin is ok with me. Co-maintainer of resiprocate would also be
>> something I'd be willing to take on.
> 
> It's been a couple of weeks now, and I don't see "raineforest" listed
> as admin for asio[1]. Can you please add him as requested?

I had added Dakota as developer (commit?) and when I looked tonight, I
notice he had vanished.  I've added him now as admin.  Is there any way
to see how he vanished?  Does he need to explicitly click something to
accept the permissions?


> Also, resiprocate[2] was retired three months ago after being orphaned
> for 6 weeks for failing to build for Fedora 31[3]. It will need to go
> through a whole new review process *after* asio is updated.

Is it possible to make Covid-19 exception for this and just put it back
again?  Lots of people want to use the WebRTC conferencing features.
Yesterday I updated[4] JSCommunicator and today I tweaked[5] resiprocate
for asio 1.14.0 so it is ready to go in Fedora, EPEL and fedrtc.org.  I
have a backlog of upstream issues in all these projects and would prefer
not to lose time in another review process.

> 
> [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/asio
> [2]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/resiprocate
> [3]: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8917#comment-610267
> 

[4]: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/jssip
[5]: https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/commits/master
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux