On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:04:20PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:05 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 07. 03. 20 0:29, Tim Flink wrote: > > > If you have any questions about this, feel free to reply to this thread. > > > > Hello Tim. > > > > I have 3 questions. > > > > I'll selectively pick just the questions I want to reply to and leave the > rest to Tim :-) > > > > > > 1) On what level of Fedora leadership was this decision made (and where > > can I > > read about it)? > > > > 2) Why are we removing something that arguably has a lot of value with > > something > > that doesn't exist yet? > > > > It's not a direct response to your question, but one important fact is that > our beefy machines in Fedora Infrastructure are out of warranty now (and > replacing them would cost a lot of money, I assume). That's one of the > major reasons why they won't be migrated to the new datacenter location, I > believe. Maybe that shows my ignorance, but has the approach of using machines w/o warranty been considered? Most servers seem to work just fine for years and years, and the warranty is mostly useful to catch factory defects. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
