On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 18:11:43 +0100, Vladimir Slavik wrote: > Hi! Hi Vladmir, Thanks for taking a look! > Anaconda dev here (a new one, but never mind). Comparing to the other topics in > quick docs, the Anaconda pages in the queue are very technical, and I'd say > more of a fringe topic than eg. httpd or kernel. So are quick docs really the > right place for this? I honestly don't know. These were converted along with a bunch of other wiki pages when the quick-docs were initially populated. I'll remove them from the quick-docs now. > Is the wiki is going away? If so, maybe let's have these as quick docs for now. > But if not, I think the majority of the info is detrimental alongside the other > quick docs. (One exception could be Anaconda Updates.) Also, this information > can go to other places without being lost. We have some docs in the repo, some > as a standalone book, etc... No, the wiki isn't going away but it is meant to be more of a scratch pad for contributors now. Relatively static information is slowly being moved to the docs. This includes user-facing documentation, and other bits like SOP documents for various teams. For example: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/engineering/ -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
