On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 13:21 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Retrying while simplifying... > > The spec file contains these two lines: > > %triggerpostun -- fedora-release < 32 > %systemd_post fstrim.timer > > I don't know the proper terminology, but I think 'fedora-release' is a > meta package? Since this doesn't exist on anyone's F31 system, I > wonder if this should be 'fedora-release-common' instead? hmm, that's actually a bit tricky, because there's no 'right' way to use a real package there. It's canon that you can't assume the 'fedora- release' packages specifically are installed, because we allow for customization: the 'system-release' virtual provides exist for this purpose. All the 'fedora-release' and 'generic-release' subpackages should provide the same 'system-release' stuff, anything that depends on release-y things is supposed to use 'system-release' (not 'fedora- release'), and the idea is that if you're branding Fedora, you fork generic-release into your *own* 'branded' -release packages which should also provide all the canonical 'system-release' provides. So...if you can't use virtual provides for triggers, it looks hard to do that :/ -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
