Linux TCP/IP Netfilter
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: DNAT multiple --to-destination gone: why?
- From: Josh Cepek <josh.cepek@xxxxxxx>
- DNAT multiple --to-destination gone: why?
- From: "David Sparks" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.95 compile error
- From: Dave <finalglide@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and ESTABLISHED / UNREPLIED connections
- From: Robert L Mathews <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] libnetfilter_conntrack 0.0.96 release
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and ESTABLISHED / UNREPLIED connections
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: "Charles Romestant" <cromestant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: "Charles Romestant" <cromestant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: "Charles Romestant" <cromestant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: "Charles Romestant" <cromestant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and ESTABLISHED / UNREPLIED connections
- From: Robert L Mathews <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.95 compile error
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.95 compile error
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and ESTABLISHED / UNREPLIED connections
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What are these and how can I not log them?
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What are these and how can I not log them?
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: "Charles Romestant" <cromestant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: "Charles Romestant" <cromestant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and ESTABLISHED / UNREPLIED connections
- From: Robert L Mathews <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What are these and how can I not log them?
- From: Simon <tanstaafl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What are these and how can I not log them?
- From: Simon <tanstaafl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: "Charles Romestant" <cromestant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: "Charles Romestant" <cromestant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.95 compile error
- From: Dave <finalglide@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What are these and how can I not log them?
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding .
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- What are these and how can I not log them?
- From: Simon <tanstaafl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Port Forwarding .
- From: "Charles Romestant" <cromestant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables resources consumed
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables resources consumed
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables resources consumed
- From: "Elison Niven" <Elison.Niven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- NAT only selected bridges
- From: Pekka Järvinen <pekkajarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: re : iptables resources consumed
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipp2 won't compile with lastest iptables from git
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipp2 won't compile with lastest iptables from git
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipp2 won't compile with lastest iptables from git
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipp2 won't compile with lastest iptables from git
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipp2 won't compile with lastest iptables from git
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipp2 won't compile with lastest iptables from git
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Error on building libnetfilter_conntrack debian package from git source
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ipp2 won't compile with lastest iptables from git
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NFQUEUE hello world-style program
- From: Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxx>
- Re: NFQUEUE hello world-style program
- From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NFQUEUE hello world-style program
- From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NFQUEUE hello world-style program
- From: Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxx>
- re : iptables resources consumed
- From: "Elison Niven" <elison.niven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.95 compile error
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables resources consumed
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables resources consumed
- From: "Elison Niven" <elison.niven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset-2.3.2
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- NFQUEUE hello world-style program
- From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- conntrack and ESTABLISHED / UNREPLIED connections
- From: Robert L Mathews <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset-2.3.2
- From: "G.W. Haywood" <ged@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re : iptables resources consumed
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset-2.3.2
- From: Krzysztof Oledzki <ole@xxxxxx>
- Re : iptables resources consumed
- From: "Elison Niven" <Elison.Niven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset-2.3.2
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables resources consumed
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables resources consumed
- From: "G.W. Haywood" <ged@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables resources consumed
- From: "Elison Niven" <Elison.Niven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables resources consumed
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset-2.3.2
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset-2.3.2
- From: Krzysztof Oledzki <ole@xxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset-2.3.2
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset-2.3.2
- From: Krzysztof Oledzki <ole@xxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset-2.3.2
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] ipset-2.3.2
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd: segfault at ignore_pool.c:37
- From: Evan Borgstrom <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
- conntrackd: segfault at ignore_pool.c:37
- From: Evan Borgstrom <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
- iptables resources consumed
- From: Elison.Niven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- pptpd on multiple wan connections
- From: "Wessel Louwris" <wessel.louwris@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?] [Solution]
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.95 compile error
- From: Dave <finalglide@xxxxxxxxx>
- libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.95 compile error
- From: Dave <finalglide@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?] [Solution]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Dave <finalglide@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?] [Solution]
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?] [Solution]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?] [Solution]
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?] [Solution]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?] [Solution]
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Dave <finalglide@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: POM Xtables???
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- POM Xtables???
- From: Dave <finalglide@xxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] libnfnetlink and libnetfilter_* libraries release
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Xtables compilation problem
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Xtables compilation problem
- From: "Javier Gálvez Guerrero" <javier.galvez.guerrero@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: multiprimary conntrackd setup
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- load balance [OT?] [Solution]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: multiprimary conntrackd setup
- From: "Sebastian Vieira" <sebvieira@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Thomas Bätzler <t.baetzler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: multiprimary conntrackd setup
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NAT issue on a machine with both routing and bridging.
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: VPN client from behind a firewall
- From: "Gergely Buday" <gbuday@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: VPN client from behind a firewall
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NAT issue on a machine with both routing and bridging.
- From: Francois Goudal <fg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: VPN client from behind a firewall
- From: "Gergely Buday" <gbuday@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to mark traffic on used bandwidth
- From: "Anatoly Muliarski" <x86ever@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to mark traffic on used bandwidth
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to mark traffic on used bandwidth
- From: "Anatoly Muliarski" <x86ever@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to mark traffic on used bandwidth
- From: "Anatoly Muliarski" <x86ever@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to mark traffic on used bandwidth
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to mark traffic on used bandwidth
- From: "Anatoly Muliarski" <x86ever@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NAT issue on a machine with both routing and bridging.
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NAT issue on a machine with both routing and bridging.
- From: Francois Goudal <fg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NAT issue on a machine with both routing and bridging.
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NAT issue on a machine with both routing and bridging.
- From: Francois Goudal <fg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to mark traffic on used bandwidth
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning: never matched protocol: ah. use extension match instead.
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NAT issue on a machine with both routing and bridging.
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- NAT issue on a machine with both routing and bridging.
- From: Francois Goudal <fg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Warning: never matched protocol: ah. use extension match instead.
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Warning: never matched protocol: ah. use extension match instead.
- From: Thomas Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Thomas Bätzler <t.baetzler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Thomas Bätzler <t.baetzler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: multiprimary conntrackd setup
- From: "Sebastian Vieira" <sebvieira@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to mark traffic on used bandwidth
- From: "Ivan Petrushev" <ivanatora@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: multiprimary conntrackd setup
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to mark traffic on used bandwidth
- From: "Anatoly Muliarski" <x86ever@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: multiprimary conntrackd setup
- From: "Sebastian Vieira" <sebvieira@xxxxxxxxx>
- undefined references when linking
- From: Simon <turner25@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and PREROUTING
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and PREROUTING
- From: Doug Kehn <rdkehn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and PREROUTING
- From: Doug Kehn <rdkehn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and PREROUTING
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and PREROUTING
- From: Doug Kehn <rdkehn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and PREROUTING
- From: Gáspár Lajos <swifty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and PREROUTING
- From: Doug Kehn <rdkehn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to SNAT in PREROUTING table for local machine
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and PREROUTING
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to SNAT in PREROUTING table for local machine
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and PREROUTING
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrack and PREROUTING
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- conntrack and PREROUTING
- From: Doug Kehn <rdkehn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to SNAT in PREROUTING table for local machine
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Triple Duplicate Acks
- From: "A System Admin" <asysad@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: too many INVALID packets
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to SNAT in PREROUTING table for local machine
- From: "Tobias Krummen" <tobias.krummen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: iphash vs iptreemap
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: too many INVALID packets
- From: Vladislav Kurz <vladislav.kurz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: iphash vs iptreemap
- From: "Nishit Shah" <nishit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: iphash vs iptreemap
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: too many INVALID packets
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: too many INVALID packets
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: too many INVALID packets
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: too many INVALID packets
- From: Vladislav Kurz <vladislav.kurz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: iphash vs iptreemap
- From: "Nishit Shah" <nishit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: iphash vs iptreemap
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: iphash vs iptreemap
- From: "Nishit Shah" <nishit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iphash vs iptreemap
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- iphash vs iptreemap
- From: "Nishit Shah" <nishit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables1.4.1.1 no iptables
- From: "Gabor Z. Papp" <gzp@xxxxxxx>
- iptables1.4.1.1 no iptables
- From: michael <mteicher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is this traffic dropped?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is this traffic dropped?
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is this traffic dropped?
- From: Benedikt Gollatz <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is this traffic dropped?
- From: Douglas Rabe <drabe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is this traffic dropped?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is this traffic dropped?
- From: Gáspár Lajos <swifty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Why is this traffic dropped?
- From: Douglas Rabe <drabe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipt postrouting nat / ebt postrouting nat - question about order when bridge-nf is enabled
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- ipt postrouting nat / ebt postrouting nat - question about order when bridge-nf is enabled
- From: Michal Soltys <soltys@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: too many INVALID packets
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: multiprimary conntrackd setup
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- too many INVALID packets
- From: Vladislav Kurz <vladislav.kurz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ipset-2.3.1 released
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1.1
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Duplicated multicast packets with -j ROUTE --tee
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ipset-2.3.1 released
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: rule is ignored for the localhost
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: rule is ignored for the localhost
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ipset-2.3.1 released
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ipset-2.3.1 released
- From: "ArcosCom Linux User" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Duplicated multicast packets with -j ROUTE --tee
- From: "Javier Gálvez Guerrero" <javier.galvez.guerrero@xxxxxxxxx>
- multiprimary conntrackd setup
- From: "Sebastian Vieira" <sebvieira@xxxxxxxxx>
- Duplicated multicast packets with -j ROUTE --tee
- From: "Javier Gálvez Guerrero" <javier.galvez.guerrero@xxxxxxxxx>
- Duplicating multicast packets with -j ROUTE --tee
- From: "Javier Gálvez Guerrero" <javier.galvez.guerrero@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: patch-o-matic and recent kernel/iptables
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: ROUTE patch is not present in newer patch-o-matic-ng snapshots?
- From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ipset-2.3.1 released
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ROUTE patch is not present in newer patch-o-matic-ng snapshots?
- From: "ifj. Tarnay Kálmán" <kalmisoft@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Want to "plug in" a link-level protocol into IP stack
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Want to "plug in" a link-level protocol into IP stack
- From: "Len Gross" <sandiegobiker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: rule is ignored for the localhost
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: Rainer Sabelka <sabelka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- rule is ignored for the localhost
- From: "Artem Y. Pervin" <artempervin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Troubles with iptables, ip and VPN
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: VPN client from behind a firewall
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: VPN client from behind a firewall
- From: mathieu <mathieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- VPN client from behind a firewall
- From: "Gergely Buday" <gbuday@xxxxxxxxx>
- Troubles with iptables, ip and VPN
- From: mathieu <mathieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Troubles with iptables, ip and VPN
- From: Mathieu Espagnacq <mathieu.espagnacq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: patch-o-matic and recent kernel/iptables
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ipset-2.3.1 released
- From: pud <pud@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- patch-o-matic and recent kernel/iptables
- From: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães <leolistas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables 1.4.1 + iprange fails for me
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables 1.4.1 + iprange fails for me
- From: Maxim Britov <maxim.britov@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: iptables 1.4.1 + iprange fails for me
- From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables 1.4.1 + iprange fails for me
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: iptables 1.4.1 + iprange fails for me
- From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- iptables 1.4.1 + iprange fails for me
- From: Maxim Britov <maxim.britov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: Rainer Sabelka <sabelka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: Rainer Sabelka <sabelka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Defragmentation in Netfilter Hook
- From: rigoberto perez <rigo666beast@xxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCEMENT] ipset-2.3.1 released
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to log SNAT mappings?
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Problem with TCP connections
- From: rigoberto perez <rigo666beast@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: "Marco Barbero" <marco.barbero@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: Rainer Sabelka <sabelka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it possible to log SNAT mappings?
- From: Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxx>
- Is it possible to log SNAT mappings?
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: Rainer Sabelka <sabelka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Thomas Bätzler <t.baetzler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reporting problems
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd causes kernel panic
- From: "Marco Barbero" <marco.barbero@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd causes kernel panic
- From: Rainer Sabelka <sabelka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- conntrackd causes kernel panic
- From: Rainer Sabelka <sabelka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- conntrackd [ERROR] commit: Invalid argument
- From: "Marco Barbero" <marco.barbero@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Thomas Bätzler <t.baetzler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [libnetfilter_queue] Load Balancing using multiple queues
- From: Vincent Arniego <vincent_arniego@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Thomas Bätzler <t.baetzler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Thomas Bätzler <t.baetzler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- how to use eficiently CLASSIFY, MARK, CONNMARK, CONNLIMIT ?
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipp2p segfault with kernel 2.6.24.7
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipp2p segfault with kernel 2.6.24.7
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipp2p segfault with kernel 2.6.24.7
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipp2p segfault with kernel 2.6.24.7
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipp2p segfault with kernel 2.6.24.7
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- ipp2p segfault with kernel 2.6.24.7
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10875] New: Oops in nf_nat_setup_info
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [libnetfilter_queue] Load Balancing using multiple queues
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [libnetfilter_queue] Load Balancing using multiple queues
- From: Thomas Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [libnetfilter_queue] Load Balancing using multiple queues
- From: Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxx>
- Re: nf_conntrack_sip howto ?
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Thomas Bätzler <t.baetzler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- nf_conntrack_sip howto ?
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1-rc3
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [libnetfilter_queue] Load Balancing using multiple queues
- From: Vincent Arniego <vincent_arniego@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [libnetfilter_queue] Load Balancing using multiple queues
- From: Thomas Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [libnetfilter_queue] Load Balancing using multiple queues
- From: Vincent Arniego <vincent_arniego@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [netfilter-core] [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1-rc2
- From: "Gabor Z. Papp" <gzp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables -t raw [conditions] -j TRACE is not logging
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [netfilter-core] [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1-rc2
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release conntrack-tools 0.9.7
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release conntrack-tools 0.9.7
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Router with 2 public interfaces
- From: Thomas Bätzler <t.baetzler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Weird nat/conntrack Problem with PASV FTP upload
- From: Thomas Bätzler <t.baetzler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release conntrack-tools 0.9.7
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: "extensions/libipt_ah.c" iptables 1.4.0 compilation problem
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forwarding packets received on bridged interfaces -regarding
- From: "Knight Tiger" <caugar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Difficulty with iptables script to only allow 3 ports across the firewall
- Re: Difficulty with iptables script to only allow 3 ports across the firewall
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Difficulty with iptables script to only allow 3 ports across the firewall
- From: Steven Ayre <steveayre@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Difficulty with iptables script to only allow 3 ports across the firewall
- From: Glenn Henshaw <thraxisp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Difficulty with iptables script to only allow 3 ports across the firewall
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release conntrack-tools 0.9.7
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: "extensions/libipt_ah.c" iptables 1.4.0 compilation problem
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- "extensions/libipt_ah.c" iptables 1.4.0 compilation problem
- From: SŽébastien Cramatte <scramatte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?]
- From: "ArcosCom Linux User" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?]
- From: Mark Perry <rita.co.ltd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SIP services
- From: whiplash <whiplash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- SIP services
- From: "marcos" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: load balance [OT?]
- From: Mark Perry <rita.co.ltd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Possible NetFilter Bug (2.4.27 and 2.6.20 kernel)
- From: Glenn Henshaw <thraxisp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- load balance [OT?]
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip rule with fwmark trouble
- From: Thomas Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ip rule with fwmark trouble
- From: 李伟华 <liweihuahot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables limit --limit limitations
- From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@xxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] Release conntrack-tools 0.9.7
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] libnetfilter_conntrack 0.0.94 release
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] libnfnetlink release 0.0.38
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: TEE in filter table
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forwarding packets received on bridged interfaces -regarding
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forwarding packets received on bridged interfaces -regarding
- From: "Knight Tiger" <caugar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTABLES port forwarding woes
- From: Erich Weiler <weiler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTABLES port forwarding woes
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTABLES port forwarding woes
- From: Erich Weiler <weiler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTABLES port forwarding woes
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTABLES port forwarding woes
- From: Erich Weiler <weiler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTABLES port forwarding woes
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- IPTABLES port forwarding woes
- From: Erich Weiler <weiler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- IPTABLES port forwarding woes
- From: Erich Weiler <weiler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: TEE in filter table
- From: "Gilad Benjamini" <gilad.benjamini@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DUAL wan issue, destination-based routing
- From: "ArcosCom Linux User" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NAT on the same network
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DUAL wan issue, destination-based routing
- From: paulobruck1 <paulobruck1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem accessing to Windows Terminal Server in load balancing.
- From: Thomas Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NAT on the same network
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Site-specific filter rules problem
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forwarding packets received on bridged interfaces -regarding
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Site-specific filter rules problem
- From: Mark Baker <mbaker824@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forwarding packets received on bridged interfaces -regarding
- From: "Knight Tiger" <caugar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Forwarding packets received on bridged interfaces -regarding
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem accessing to Windows Terminal Server in load balancing.
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NAT on the same network
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Forwarding packets received on bridged interfaces -regarding
- From: "Knight Tiger" <caugar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DUAL wan issue, destination-based routing
- From: "ArcosCom Linux User" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DUAL wan issue, destination-based routing
- From: jeev <smallpox@xxxxxxxxx>
- NAT on the same network
- From: Matton <Matton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Classify target and non-terminating targets
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Classify target and non-terminating targets
- From: LDC - Jairo Eduardo Lopez <jairo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: TEE target
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: TEE target
- From: "Gilad Benjamini" <gilad.benjamini@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: IPTABLES and SAMBA behind NAT
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- ipsec not always routing/transmitting the packets
- From: François Legal <francois.legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: IPTABLES and SAMBA behind NAT
- From: "ad marginem" <admarginem@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: IPTABLES and SAMBA behind NAT
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DUAL wan issue, destination-based routing
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: IPTABLES and SAMBA behind NAT
- From: "ad marginem" <admarginem@xxxxxxxxx>
- Problem accessing to Windows Terminal Server in load balancing.
- From: "ArcosCom Linux User" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [netfilter-core] [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1-rc2
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [netfilter-core] [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1-rc2
- From: "Gabor Z. Papp" <gzp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: DUAL wan issue, destination-based routing
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- using kernel_sendmsg function to send tcp package would return broken pipe error
- From: "jiuwei li" <lijiuwei0902@xxxxxxxxx>
- DUAL wan issue, destination-based routing
- From: jeev <smallpox@xxxxxxxxx>
- DUAL wan issue, destination-based routing
- From: jeev <smallpox@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: TEE target
- From: "Gilad Benjamini" <gilad.benjamini@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: TEE target
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building geoip against voyage kernel source fails
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- TEE target
- From: "Gilad Benjamini" <gilad.benjamini@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Site-specific filter rules problem
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Distros that can run conntrack-tools/conntrackd with the default kernel
- From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
- Re: [netfilter-core] [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1-rc2
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [netfilter-core] [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1-rc2
- From: "Gabor Z. Papp" <gzp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Building geoip against voyage kernel source fails
- From: "David Balnaves" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: whiplash <whiplash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1-rc2
- From: "Gabor Z. Papp" <gzp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [netfilter-core] [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1-rc2
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: Filippo Zeus <filippozeus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: Filippo Zeus <filippozeus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: whiplash <whiplash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: Filippo Zeus <filippozeus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: whiplash <whiplash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: Filippo Zeus <filippozeus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: whiplash <whiplash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- iptables ip_conntrack_ftp + proftpd TLS: PORT command not understood
- From: Filippo Zeus <filippozeus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipt_recent: how long does a violater stay in the bad guys list?
- From: Franck JONCOURT <franck.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- performance of connlimit match module
- From: Thomas Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1-rc2
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipt_recent: how long does a violater stay in the bad guys list?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables limit --limit limitations
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building geoip against voyage kernel source fails
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building geoip against voyage kernel source fails
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- connmark and fwmark not working - just a little long
- From: paulobruck1 <paulobruck1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building geoip against voyage kernel source fails
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building geoip against voyage kernel source fails
- From: Nick Pasich <NewsLetters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Site-specific filter rules problem
- From: Mark Baker <mbaker824@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building geoip against voyage kernel source fails
- From: "David Balnaves" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Building geoip against voyage kernel source fails
- From: "David Balnaves" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT iptables bug or connection tracking issue?
- From: challado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: DNAT iptables bug or connection tracking issue?
- From: Josh Cepek <josh.cepek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Forwarding packets received on bridged interfaces to DHCP server -regarding
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- DNAT iptables bug or connection tracking issue?
- From: Irmãos Bocchi & CIA Ltda <challado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- policy routing and iptables troubles
- From: "Sapytsky Ilya" <sova00@xxxxxxxxx>
- Forwarding packets received on bridged interfaces to DHCP server -regarding
- From: "Knight Tiger" <caugar@xxxxxxxxx>
- ipt_recent: how long does a violater stay in the bad guys list?
- From: Akhil Sharma <goodpriest@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Distros that can run conntrack-tools/conntrackd with the default kernel
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Distros that can run conntrack-tools/conntrackd with the default kernel
- From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
- Re: Distros that can run conntrack-tools/conntrackd with the default kernel
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Distros that can run conntrack-tools/conntrackd with the default kernel
- From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
- Re: Distros that can run conntrack-tools/conntrackd with the default kernel
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Distros that can run conntrack-tools/conntrackd with the default kernel
- From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
- Router with 2 public interfaces
- From: "Flávio Costa" <fcosta75@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE]: Move to git completed
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- iptables -t raw [conditions] -j TRACE is not logging
- From: "Jaroslav Rakhmatoullin" <jazzoslav@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables 1.4.1-rc1
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Handling large list of rules - Efficient or not?
- From: lists+netfilter@xxxxxxx
- Handling large list of rules - Efficient or not?
- From: "howard chen" <howachen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
- From: Alexei Ustyuzhaninov <alust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: sequence of matches in a single rule
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: sequence of matches in a single rule
- From: "Nishit Shah" <nishit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: sequence of matches in a single rule
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: sequence of matches in a single rule
- From: "Nishit Shah" <nishit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- iptables limit --limit limitations
- From: "Payam Chychi" <pchychi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sequence of matches in a single rule
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- sequence of matches in a single rule
- From: "Nishit Shah" <nishit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
- From: Alexei Ustyuzhaninov <alust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- include/linux/netfilter.h after make headers_install is incomplete
- From: "Greg Steuck" <greg@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: logdrop rule does not work any more
- From: Gáspár Lajos <swifty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Netfiler REAL Rule Match Sequence
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- logdrop rule does not work any more
- From: Daniel Dvořák <dandee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE]: Move to git completed
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- ebtables problem with Xen bridges
- From: John Haxby <john.haxby@xxxxxxxxxx>
- iptables limit issue
- From: "Payam Chychi" <pchychi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Netfiler REAL Rule Match Sequence
- From: Покотиленко Костик <casper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Netfiler REAL Rule Match Sequence
- From: "Jürgen Rochol" <juergen.rox@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Re: conntrackd daemon stops: is conntrackd running?]
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd daemon stops: is conntrackd running?
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd synchronisation at startup
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- conntrackd synchronisation at startup
- From: Christophe Painchaud <dash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Netfiler REAL Rule Match Sequence
- From: "Jürgen Rochol" <juergen.rox@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Netfiler REAL Rule Match Sequence
- From: "Jürgen Rochol" <juergen.rox@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack files
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack files
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Netfiler REAL Rule Match Sequence
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip_conntrack files
- From: Dave <finalglide@xxxxxxxxx>
- Netfiler REAL Rule Match Sequence
- From: "Jürgen Rochol" <juergen.rox@xxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE]: Call for sponsors for the 6th netfilter developer workshop
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE]: Netfilter Workshop 2008
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- ip_conntrack files
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Update iptables rules according to received user lists
- From: "Ling Deng" <lingwsm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with mms-conntrack-nat
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Problems with mms-conntrack-nat
- From: "Peter Kaagman" <P.Kaagman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables and performance
- From: Eli Hadad <elhadad@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables and performance
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables and performance
- From: Matt Zagrabelny <mzagrabe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with mms-conntrack-nat
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with mms-conntrack-nat
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack
- From: Martin <mylists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Problems with mms-conntrack-nat
- From: "Peter Kaagman" <P.Kaagman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Re: conntrackd daemon stops: is conntrackd running?]
- From: Pablo Florencio <pabloflorencio@xxxxxxx>
- iptables and performance
- From: Eli Hadad <elhadad@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT routing problem
- From: "Andrea Ranieri" <andreran@xxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conntrackd daemon stops: is conntrackd running?
- From: Maximilian Wilhelm <max@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- conntrackd daemon stops: is conntrackd running?
- From: Pablo Florencio <pabloflorencio@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Reasons for SFQ not being fair
- From: Покотиленко Костик <casper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
- From: Alexei Ustyuzhaninov <alust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
- From: Alexei Ustyuzhaninov <alust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Request for comments: CLUSTERIP target emulator / replacement
- From: "Mark Robson" <markxr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT routing problem
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT routing problem
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: "sean darcy" <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx>
- ipt_ACCOUNT compile problem
- From: Dave <finalglide@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT routing problem
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT routing problem
- From: "Andrea Ranieri" <andreran@xxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT routing problem
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT routing problem
- From: "Andrea Ranieri" <andreran@xxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT routing problem
- From: Cloves Pereira Costa Jr <cloves.costa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT routing problem
- From: "Andrea Ranieri" <andreran@xxxxxx>
- Re: accept rule not working.
- From: Gáspár Lajos <swifty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip rule fwmarks letting me down
- From: Geoff Crompton <geoffc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: Mike Wright <mike.wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT routing problem
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: viewing rules and traffic while inserting/removing rules
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- DNAT routing problem
- From: "Andrea Ranieri" <andreran@xxxxxx>
- Re: viewing rules and traffic while inserting/removing rules
- From: lists+netfilter@xxxxxxx
- Re: viewing rules and traffic while inserting/removing rules
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ip rule fwmarks letting me down
- From: whiplash <whiplash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accept rule not working.
- From: Gáspár Lajos <swifty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- ip rule fwmarks letting me down
- From: Geoff Crompton <geoffc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accept rule not working.
- From: "eial@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <eial@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- why can't I DNAT SIP?
- From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: viewing rules and traffic while inserting/removing rules
- From: lists+netfilter@xxxxxxx
- RE: accept rule not working.
- From: "eial@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <eial@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SNAT spoofing problem
- From: Josh Cepek <josh.cepek@xxxxxxx>
- RE: viewing rules and traffic while inserting/removing rules
- From: "Steven Kath" <steven.kath@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SNAT spoofing problem
- From: Gary Renshaw <gary@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SNAT spoofing problem
- From: Gáspár Lajos <swifty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: viewing rules and traffic while inserting/removing rules
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- SNAT spoofing problem
- From: Gary Renshaw <gary@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- viewing rules and traffic while inserting/removing rules
- From: lists+netfilter@xxxxxxx
- Re: accept rule not working.
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accept rule not working.
- From: Karim Asif <karimas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: accept rule not working.
- From: Gáspár Lajos <swifty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: accept rule not working.
- From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- accept rule not working.
- From: "eial@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <eial@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- fwmark iptables/ip routing interaction question
- From: pthyseba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- RE: iptables: Chain already exists
- From: "Michael Smith" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- iptables: Chain already exists
- From: Georgecooldude <georgecooldude@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: host based redirect
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filtering module on OSI level 7?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: host based redirect
- From: Diego Lacerda <diegolacerda@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: host based redirect
- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: host based redirect
- From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- host based redirect
- From: "aergis@xxxxxxxxx" <aergis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filtering module on OSI level 7?
- From: Benedikt Gollatz <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filtering module on OSI level 7?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Filtering module on OSI level 7?
- From: Benedikt Gollatz <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: does -p udp --dport 5060 not work with -j LOG?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Filtering module on OSI level 7?
- From: Christoph Ehret <christoph.ehret@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: does -p udp --dport 5060 not work with -j LOG?
- From: "Steven Kath" <steven.kath@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: does -p udp --dport 5060 not work with -j LOG?
- From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Dynamically adding rules - are connection tracking states maintained?
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: does -p udp --dport 5060 not work with -j LOG?
- From: Diego Lacerda <diegolacerda@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: does -p udp --dport 5060 not work with -j LOG?
- From: "Steven Kath" <steven.kath@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: does -p udp --dport 5060 not work with -j LOG?
- From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Dynamically adding rules - are connection tracking states maintained?
- From: Petr Pisar <petr.pisar@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Dynamically adding rules - are connection tracking states maintained?
- From: Josh Cepek <josh.cepek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Dynamically adding rules - are connection tracking states maintained?
- From: noa levy <levynoa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: does -p udp --dport 5060 not work with -j LOG?
- From: "Diego Lacerda" <diegolacerda@xxxxxxxxx>
- does -p udp --dport 5060 not work with -j LOG?
- From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables 1.4.0.77, Xtables-addons 1.5.4.1
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables 1.4.0.77, Xtables-addons 1.5.4.1
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables 1.4.0.77, Xtables-addons 1.5.4.1
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables 1.4.0.77, Xtables-addons 1.5.4.1
- From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: udp connection moved from ASSURED to UNREPLIED
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Dynamically adding rules - are connection tracking states maintained?
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables 1.4.0.77, Xtables-addons 1.5.4.1
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Reasons for SFQ not being fair
- From: Покотиленко Костик <casper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question
- From: "Diego Lacerda" <diegolacerda@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Dynamically adding rules - are connection tracking states maintained?
- From: noa levy <levynoa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libnetfilter_conntrack: Unable to create an entry in the expectation table (invalid argument)
- From: "Emmanuel B" <emmanuel.b.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] Wolfotrack 1.0 released
- From: "Sebastien Tricaud" <stricaud@xxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25: Weird IPv4 stack behaviour, IPv6 is fine
- From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iptables 1.4.0.77, Xtables-addons 1.5.4.1
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Doc: Writing your own Netfilter modules
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25: Weird IPv4 stack behaviour, IPv6 is fine
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25: Weird IPv4 stack behaviour, IPv6 is fine
- From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Question
- From: "Karim Reda Fakhir" <karimreda.fakhir@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: udp connection moved from ASSURED to UNREPLIED
- From: Aymeric Moizard <jack@xxxxxxxxx>
- Doc: Writing your own Netfilter modules
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- iptables 1.4.0.77, Xtables-addons 1.5.4.1
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libnetfilter_conntrack: Unable to create an entry in the expectation table (invalid argument)
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: udp connection moved from ASSURED to UNREPLIED
- From: Aymeric Moizard <jack@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: allowing packets from dynamic-dns IP
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: allowing packets from dynamic-dns IP
- From: Josh Cepek <josh.cepek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: allowing packets from dynamic-dns IP
- From: "Yakov Lerner" <iler.ml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: allowing packets from dynamic-dns IP
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: allowing packets from dynamic-dns IP
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: allowing packets from dynamic-dns IP
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: allowing packets from dynamic-dns IP
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: udp connection moved from ASSURED to UNREPLIED
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- allowing packets from dynamic-dns IP
- From: "Yakov Lerner" <iler.ml@xxxxxxxxx>
- udp connection moved from ASSURED to UNREPLIED
- From: Aymeric Moizard <jack@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ipt_iplimit.so
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch] portknocking module: casting bug
- From: fender <frozenspot@xxxxxxxxx>
- ipt_iplimit.so
- From: Zachary Eadie <zeadie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nfconntrack and asymmetric routing
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Loopback security...
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Loopback security...
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Port Forwarding Problem
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nfconntrack and asymmetric routing
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nfconntrack and asymmetric routing
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nfconntrack and asymmetric routing
- From: "Marco Berizzi" <pupilla@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Dynamically adding rules - are connection tracking states maintained?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nfconntrack and asymmetric routing
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Handling RoadWarrior VPN Traffic with IPtables
- From: Henrique Netfilter <henrique.netfilter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Test
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Test
- From: "Peter Boughton" <boughtonp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Handling RoadWarrior VPN Traffic with IPtables
- From: Henrique Netfilter <henrique.netfilter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: intended behavior of REDIRECT
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Handling RoadWarrior VPN Traffic with IPtables
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Handling RoadWarrior VPN Traffic with IPtables
- From: Henrique Netfilter <henrique.netfilter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Test
- From: Henrique Netfilter <henrique.netfilter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT, and finding out original destination IP?
- From: "Bradley Kite" <bradley.kite@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT, and finding out original destination IP?
- From: "Bradley Kite" <bradley.kite@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT, and finding out original destination IP?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Invalid SACK numbers in NAT'ed packets
- From: "Leonid Zeitlin" <lz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Invalid SACK numbers in NAT'ed packets
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- DNAT, and finding out original destination IP?
- From: "Bradley Kite" <bradley.kite@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Invalid SACK numbers in NAT'ed packets
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- libnetfilter_conntrack: Unable to create an entry in the expectation table (invalid argument)
- From: "Emmanuel B" <emmanuel.b.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Invalid SACK numbers in NAT'ed packets
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Invalid SACK numbers in NAT'ed packets
- From: "Leonid Zeitlin" <lz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT IPSec
- From: Tom Tonk <tnbt@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: DNAT IPSec
- From: Tom Tonk <tnbt@xxxxxxxx>
- DNAT IPSec
- From: Tom Tonk <tnbt@xxxxxxxx>
- Port Forwarding Problem
- From: Ivan Hernandez <ihernandez@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Dynamically adding rules - are connection tracking states maintained?
- From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dynamically adding rules - are connection tracking states maintained?
- From: noa levy <levynoa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Cloning Traffic had having it processed by two different hosts - TEE
- From: Bjoern Weiland <bjoern.weiland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Invalid SACK numbers in NAT'ed packets
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Invalid SACK numbers in NAT'ed packets
- From: "Leonid Zeitlin" <lz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Redirecting ports in a bridge
- From: Javier Prieto Martínez <javier.prieto.ext@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTables : How to force data coming from ethX being output by the same device
- From: Alexei Ustyuzhaninov <alust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reject with tcp-reset on a bridge
- From: "Gilad Benjamini" <gilad.benjamini@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Cloning Traffic had having it processed by two different hosts - TEE
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Invalid SACK numbers in NAT'ed packets
- From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTables : How to force data coming from ethX being output by the same device
- From: "Yves DUF" <yves.duf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Redirecting ports in a bridge
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reject with tcp-reset on a bridge
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTables : How to force data coming from ethX being output by the same device
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Redirecting ports in a bridge
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reject with tcp-reset on a bridge
- From: "Gilad Benjamini" <gilad.benjamini@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTables : How to force data coming from ethX being output by the same device
- From: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães <leolistas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Redirecting ports in a bridge
- From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTables : How to force data coming from ethX being output by the same device
- From: Alexei Ustyuzhaninov <alust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTables : How to force data coming from ethX being output by the same device
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTables : How to force data coming from ethX being output by the same device
- From: John covici <covici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: IPTables : How to force data coming from ethX being output by the same device
- From: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães <leolistas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Redirecting ports in a bridge
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Redirecting ports in a bridge
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[LARTC]
[Berkeley Packet Filter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[Samba]
