Re: ip rule fwmarks letting me down

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



whiplash wrote:
> Geoff Crompton wrote:
> 
>> So when I ping from a machine behind this firewall, it should be routed
>> via 203.28.240.92, but it isn't. I've been running tcpdump on both
>> 203.28.240.92 and 203.28.240.91, and the packets are definately being
>> routed via 203.28.240.91.
> 
> Did you
> ip route flush cache
> before testing?

No, but I have now, and it made no difference. From my perspective, it
looks like a failure in the routing policy database, so I'm not suprised
that an 'ip route' command didn't change the situation. (However I know
nothing about the code internals, so I'm happy to conceed the point if
someone knows better).

BTW, how long do route caches last?

-- 
+-Geoff Crompton
+--Debian System Administrator
+---Trinity College


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux