Re: ip_conntrack vs. nf_conntrack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 13:30 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Friday 2008-05-16 18:07, Martin wrote:
> >
> >So I've just one question at least. If there aren't nf_conntrack_*
> >modules or aliases, does the amanda, ftp, quake3, etc. modules work just
> >loading nf_conntrack? If so, I think I'm ready to go with this kernel
> >history.
> 
> No, nf_conntrack_ftp is required for FTP (and similarly for the
> others).


But there isn't nf_conntrack_ftp.ko module. May be it have been renamed
to /lib/modules/2.6.25/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_ftp.ko ?


Cheers

Martin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux