Re: ipt postrouting nat / ebt postrouting nat - question about order when bridge-nf is enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 2008-06-18 16:49, Michal Soltys wrote:

> Hello
>
> After finding this pretty recent and nice summary of packet flow:
>
> http://jengelh.medozas.de/images/nf-packet-flow.png (1)
>
> I noticed that in case of locally generated packets (routed through
> bridge's port), ebtables nat postrouting is evaluated _after_
> iptables nat postrouting,
>
> My question - does current behaviour (as in (1)) is inteneded, or
> is it perhaps a bug, and diagram (2) should be right ?

(1), because it is recent :-)

commit 2bf540b73ed5b304e84bb4d4c390d49d1cfa0ef8
describe-tag v2.6.19-3516-g2bf540b
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Dec 13 16:54:25 2006 -0800

    [NETFILTER]: bridge-netfilter: remove deferred hooks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux