On 07/21/08 13:11, Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl wrote:
made some tries and I see that it works well with the "bridge" mode. The only thing that I do was to to create a new bridge, remove the ip address from the interfaces, add them to the bridge and set an ip address for the bridge. Nothing other. With arp_proxy 1 or 0 it works in the same manner.
*nod*
The strange it's that I already tried this solution in test room, but I remember that it didn't work. One think that forgot to say it's that when I tried, I was using a different switch configuration (that now I cannot reproduce): there was two different switch (with stp enabled and configured), each one with 3 different vlan and each of the three vlans end into one server ethernet port.
VLANs and especially STP make things more interesting.
Here, for make the communication working, I have to setup the three vlan(s) on the server port's, but they must have the same address. And, with the "bridge" solution I think that I cannot.
With traditional bridging, you would bridge the three (virtual) interfaces together and then bind your server's IP(s) to the bridge interface. I've got a system in service that has an excess of 24 different VLAN interfaces bridged together, and it's working great.
Thanks to all,
*nod* Grant. . . . -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
