IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: Privacy Terminology
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: [ippm] Last Call: draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets (TWAMP Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
- Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
- Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
- Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
- Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
- Privacy Terminology
- More on privacy: The Role of the IETF in Improving Privacy on the Internet
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: wanted: your old NAT home router
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- From: jean-michel bernier de portzamparc
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- RE: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: What does a privacy policy mean ?
- Re: What does a privacy policy mean ?
- Re: What does a privacy policy mean ?
- Re: What does a privacy policy mean ?
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: What does a privacy policy mean ?
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- RE: draft-douglass-timezone-xml-00 & Presence
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: What does a privacy policy mean ?
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- What does a privacy policy mean ?
- RE: draft-douglass-timezone-xml-00 & Presence
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: draft-douglass-timezone-xml-00 & Presence
- Re: draft-douglass-timezone-xml-00 & Presence
- draft-douglass-timezone-xml-00 & Presence
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - Speaking of Video Calls ..
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- From: Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Audio Streaming Info - IETF 78 July 25-30, 2010
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- DNS aliasing at IETF 78: call for participation
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- An updated ISD proposal
- Re: IETF privacy policy - update
- IETF privacy policy - update
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- FW: Nomcom 2010-11: Final Call for Volunteers
- FW: Nomcom 2010-11: Status of Volunteers (Third Listing)
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel-08
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- ISI Relationship with RFC Editor Ends
- From: IETF Administrative Director
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- free internet for ieters only
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- RE: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Errata [was on yam] Referencing 1652bis and update to RFC 5321/5322
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- RE: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- From: WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Admission Control to the IETF 78 and IETF 79 Networks
- Re: IETF 78: getting to/from/around Maastricht
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: motivations
- From: Nathaniel Borenstein
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [dispatch] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- FW: Third Call for Nomcom 2010-11 Volunteers
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch
- RE: small q: where is ICMP Parameter Problem (code 2) defined?
- From: WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- From: WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis-03
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis-03
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- small q: where is ICMP Parameter Problem (code 2) defined?
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis-03
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch
- Status update on draft-ietf-simple-msrp-acm and draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch
- RE: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: motivations
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: WG Review: Call Control UUI for SIP (cuss)
- Re: reminder for Itojun Service Award
- RE: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- IETF Journal Volume 6 Issue 1 - now available
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-eai-mailinglist (Mailing Lists and Internationalized Email Addresses) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis-03
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis-03
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- Re: motivations
- Re: IETF 78: getting to/from/around Maastricht
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- IETF 78: getting to/from/around Maastricht
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis-03
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 25, Issue 57
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- RE: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- From: Rémi Denis-Courmont
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- RE: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- Re: Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- From: Rémi Denis-Courmont
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Protocol for TCP heartbeats?
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis-03
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-elie-nntp-list-additions (Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) Additions to LIST Command) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- By any chance does anyone know who is the SIP guy/gal at Apple?
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01.txt
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states (Definition of IETF Working Group Document States) to Informational RFC
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- RE: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-elie-nntp-list-additions (Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) Additions to LIST Command) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Please volunteer for the 2010-2011 Nomcom
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis-03
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- reminder for Itojun Service Award
- motivations (was: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00)
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-21
- RE: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: Last Call: draft-daboo-srv-caldav (Use of SRV records for locating CalDAV and CardDAV services) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: Models of change Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- RE: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-hip-bone-06
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-hip-bone-06
- Requesting community feedback on late update to draft-turner-encryptedkeypackagecontenttype-algs
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem]]
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Federated Authentication BOF at IETF 78
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-send-cert-03
- Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: Models of change Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: Models of change Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Models of change Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Models of change Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-hip-bone-06
- Re: Models of change Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: Models of change Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: Models of change Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: Models of change Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Models of change Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nsis-applicability-mobility-signaling-17
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-hip-bone-06
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hip-via-01
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch
- secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nsis-applicability-mobility-signaling-17
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-hip-via-01
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states (Definition of IETF Working Group Document States) to Informational RFC
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nsis-applicability-mobility-signaling-17
- Re: 'Age' for webpages
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: 'Age' for webpages
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-hip-bone-06
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states (Definition of IETF Working Group Document States) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states (Definition of IETF Working Group Document States) to Informational RFC
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep)
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states (Definition of IETF Working Group Document States) to Informational RFC
- 'Age' for webpages
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep)
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: [Simple] Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-msrp-acm (An Alternative Connection Model for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis (IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS Configuration RFC 5006-bis) to Proposed Standard
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Operations Directorate Review of draft-ietf-hip-hiccups-02
- Post
- RE: [Simple] Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-msrp-acm (An Alternative Connection Model for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch (Session Matching Update for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)) to Proposed Standard
- a qtn on pmipv6 multi-homing
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: [Simple] Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-msrp-acm (An Alternative Connection Model for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch (Session Matching Update for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: SCTP Mulithoming Communication PATHS Query
- IETF Twitter
- RE: [AVT] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-20.txt
- Re: [IAOC] Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-tls-additional-random-ext (Additional Random Extension to TLS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep)
- Fwd: I-D Action:draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-20.txt
- Re: [BEHAVE] Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-stateful (Stateful NAT64: Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers) to Proposed Standard
- From: marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-stateful (Stateful NAT64: Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers) to Proposed Standard
- Re: wanted: your old NAT home router
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: wanted: your old NAT home router
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: [IAOC] Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: [IAOC] Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: [IAOC] Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: [IAOC] Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: [IAOC] Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: wanted: your old NAT home router
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- RE: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-send-cert-03
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-07
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-krishnan-v6ops-teredo-update-06
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- The point is to change it: Was: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-send-cert-03
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-krishnan-v6ops-teredo-update-06
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-csi-send-cert-03
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-csi-send-cert
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-eap-mutual
- Re: Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Proposed IAOC Administrative Procedures
- From: IETF Administrative Director
- rfc series editor (RSE) report archive and RSE web page now available
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-eap-mutual
- RE: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
- Re: IPv4 depletion makes CNN
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]