Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Since you asked, I'd like to see this move forward as quickly
as possible.

Just one practical issue seems to be hanging. The draft says:
 This document makes no change to the current STD practice; however,	
 this topic deserves further discussion by the whole community.

Fair enough. But what happens to the existing STD numbers
on the transition day?

- Do existing full Standards keep their existing STD number as they
are renamed Internet Standard? (I suggest: yes.)

- Do existing Draft Standards acquire an STD number as they are
renamed Internet Standard? (Pragmatically, I suggest no, unless
they already obsolete or update an existing STD.)

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 2010-09-02 08:02, Russ Housley wrote:
> Dear IETF community:
> 
> I just posted an update to draft-housley-two-maturity-levels.  I tried
> to reflect what I heard during the plenary discussion in Maastricht.
> Please review and comment.
> 
> Thanks,
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]