The current process involves a (weak) proof of interoperability to advance; interoperability is not even mentioned in this draft. Is that rather significant change intentional? Or did you want negative interoperability reports ("Vendor A is doing it wrong, so the spec must be unclear or have features that are unwanted") to considered objections?
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf