Hi, owner-v6ops@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Operations WG (v6ops) to > consider the following document: > - 'Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer Premises > Equipment for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service' > <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-12.txt> as an Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2010-09-27. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. I posted a review of the draft on v6ops ML more than 2 months ago (Thu, 15 Jul 2010), with substantial comments: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg04815.html Some of those are important for IPsec and MIPv6 to work. They were acknowledged privately as valid. Those comments were pointed again by Julien Laganier on the list (13 Sep 2010) a week ago: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg05349.html I understand those comments are substantial but they address valid issues, were provided a long time ago, text was proposed for some of them and even picture clarify the issues. Cheers, a+ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf