>> => I thought we were discussing the specific issue of how to solve this >> problem in _this_WG_ as I mentioned in my first email. I know what the RFC >> says and I wouldn't have done it this way but given this, I don't know how >> else you can solve it _here_. > > I am open to solve it here and I have suggestion : > > - make DHCPv6-PD-NEMO assign a default route to the Mobile Router at > home. > > What do you think? => That can work but I don't understand why you don't like the host on egress interface behaviour. The RFC seems inconsistent on its requirements for the egress interface at home, but it's been a long time since I read it so I may have forgotten some of the reasons. I think it can work and at least it will lead to a consistent implementation. Extending DHCP can work but whether it's done here or in dhc or mif is not really important to me. Hesham > > I also followed advice and went asking to DHC WG. I got redirected to > MIF soon-Charter DHCP options route table, and got mentioned > draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router req W-3 talking DHCPv6-PD and default > route. > > Alex > > >> >> Hesham >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf