On Sep 11, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > Le 11/09/2010 08:13, Hesham Soliman a écrit : >> >> >> >> On 11/09/10 12:34 AM, "Alexandru Petrescu"<alexandru.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> Le 10/09/2010 14:12, Hesham Soliman a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> When it is away from home it is fully a Host on the egress >>>>> interface. When at home fully Router on same. I am happy with it >>>>> this way. >>>>> >>>> >>>> => Ok that doesn't make any sense to me. >>> >>> Well, let me rephrase as the RFC text puts it: when the MR is at home it >>> joins the all-routers multicast address, otherwise it joins the >>> all-hosts address. ND spec says similar. Similarly, when MR at home it >>> can send RAs on the egress, if away it MUST NOT send RAs on it. It must >>> always send RAs on the ingress. This is to make sure MR doesn't break >>> the Internet routing. >>> >>> Does this sound better? >> >> => I thought we were discussing the specific issue of how to solve this >> problem in _this_WG_ as I mentioned in my first email. I know what the RFC >> says and I wouldn't have done it this way but given this, I don't know how >> else you can solve it _here_. > > I am open to solve it here and I have suggestion : > > - make DHCPv6-PD-NEMO assign a default route to the Mobile Router at > home. > > What do you think? > > I also followed advice and went asking to DHC WG. I got redirected to > MIF soon-Charter DHCP options route table, and got mentioned > draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router req W-3 talking DHCPv6-PD and default > route. => Then we better wait for this draft to move forward. Regards, Wassim H.
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf