----- Original Message ----
> From: "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@xxxxxxxx>; Alexandru Petrescu
><alexandru.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; mext <mext@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 3:38:54 PM
> Subject: RE: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix
>Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard
>
> Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> >
> > Laganier, Julien wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > [ I also note that this draft has been more than 2 years in the MEXT
> > > working group in which you are participating, which gave you ample time
>to
> > > comment on this and other things... ]
> >
> > Julien: Alex, myself, possibly others have been raising issues with
> > this draft since long time.
>
> ... during which there was no consensus that there is an issue to be addressed
>by the MEXT WG.
>
I am curious on this. If someone raises an issue during WGLC or IETF LC,
do we go back to the WG and ask if there is consensus on this issue?
I'll appreciate clarification for my education.
Regards,
Behcet
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf