>draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08 was reviewed by Dave Crocker on >August 8, 2010 [1]. I haven't seen any response to the review. > >Although there was strong concerns about this draft during the >Last-Call, the IESG has approved publication. Quoting some comments >made recently by an Area Director: > > "I don't think that it specifies well requirements it is trying to > fulfil and it doesn't use email infrastructure well while doing that." > >And a previous comment: > > "This is really hackish. Display names are not intended to be used >like this." Given that it's Informational, not standards track, and it appears to do an OK job of describing the existing Italian setup for certifed e-mail, it seems to me that it's appropriate to publish it to document existing practice, even if none of us seem to think that it's very good existing practice. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf