Hello,
At 09:37 08-08-10, Dave CROCKER wrote:
This is a summary review, with a focus on design goals and
systems-level issues.
Based on my reading of the specification, much more in-depth reviews of this
specification are appropriate and required, to consider the
fine-grained details
which could be problematic. However, this deeper review should wait for
resolution of the more basic problems with the design and specification.
draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec-08 was reviewed by Dave Crocker on
August 8, 2010 [1]. I haven't seen any response to the review.
Although there was strong concerns about this draft during the
Last-Call, the IESG has approved publication. Quoting some comments
made recently by an Area Director:
"I don't think that it specifies well requirements it is trying to
fulfil and it doesn't use email infrastructure well while doing that."
And a previous comment:
"This is really hackish. Display names are not intended to be used
like this."
I'll read Section 6.5.2 of BCP 9.
Regards,
-sm
1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg01709.html
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf