Hi, james woodyatt <jhw@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sep 21, 2010, at 09:21 , Arnaud Ebalard wrote: >> >> I understand those comments are substantial but they address valid >> issues, were provided a long time ago, text was proposed for some of >> them and even picture clarify the issues. > > Chair has let me know that I shouldn't hesitate to post a new revision > of the draft with the proposed amendments. > > Sorry for the confusion and the delay, and thank you very much for the > reminder of the where to find the previous messages. That will save > me the hassle of digging them out of my copious archives. > > I'll send Arnaud and Julien a preview of the forthcoming revision > before I post it, just to be sure I've got it basically right. > Hopefully, that revision will come out in the next couple of days-- > after I'm done being viciously flensed-- figuratively speaking-- by > the simultaneous, yet totally reasonable, demands of two competing > product managers, each with their own existential crises officially > assigned as my drop-everything ship-or-die top priority. Thanks for your effort James. I will try and reread version 13 as soon as you send it. Don't hesitate if you have questions or need some help. Cheers, a+ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf