>> Noel Chiappa wrote: >> The interesting question, of course, is whether (and if so, when) the IETF >> will deign to notice this reality - or will it continue to prefer to stick >> its collective fingers in its ears and keep going 'neener-neener-neener'. > Keith Moore wrote: > Do you actually have a point to make, Noel, or are you just > taking pot shots at IETF again? Look who's talking. Despite a brilliant mind and sometimes significant contributions, you are one of the main persons behind the failure of IPv6. The living example of the IETF ivory tower. Has it occurred to you that, if it was not for your blind opposition to NAT, we could be living in a world of 6to4 implemented in the ubiquitous NAT box? Look what you have done: not only we have more NATv4 than ever, but now we also have NAT46, NAT64, NAT464...whatever and all of these with heavy ALG layers to make it more palatable. Congratulations. Michel. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf