On 9/22/2010 12:28 PM, Ross Callon wrote: > --On Wednesday, September 22, 2010 08:53 -0700 Dave CROCKER > <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> ...On the other hand, the practical reality is that getting an >> IETF login is easy >> enough to make this issue pretty minor, IMO. > > I have two thoughts on this: > > One the one hand, I agree with the part of Dave Crocker's email that getting an IETF login is easy enough that the approach that the current nomcom is taking seems to be workable. > > Also, I don't think that we want press articles about who is running for IETF leadership positions, who was rejected and who was accepted, and so on. Thus the fact that the current approach makes you agree to keep the names confidential would appear to be a very strong statement to the press not to publish the contents of the list. > No I totally disagree. TRANSPARENCY is the rule - and it means all parties are properly tracked and all reviews are done in plain sight. That means that the people doing the reviews are accountable for them in a legal sense and that is a long-time coming here. So ... No, everything gets published. Todd > Ross > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3152 - Release Date: 09/21/10 23:34:00 > -- //----------------------------------------------------------------- This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf