On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, John C Klensin wrote: > > FWIW, the thing that really irritates me is having someone respond to a > message after quoting only a few lines (often good) but without > supplying some clue that permits me to find the message being replied to > if needed. [...] or even using a good In-reply-to field, [...] Another example of Outlook's bad interoperability. I believe that there was one release in which it implemented standard message threading, but some bright spark decided to reinvent the wheel badly. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/ HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7, DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf