Re: Fisking vs Top-Posting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 05:49:55 -0700 todd glassey wrote:
> > 
> > The real issue here is that this is a mailing list and synchronization
> > of messages is nearly impossible through the IETF lists as they exist.
> > As a result of this really stupid, stone-age methodology any number of
> > issues including this one arise.
> 
> I don't see a problem with mailing lists in general, just with the
> sometimes large delays (moderated lists?) that (at least) ietf@xxxxxxxx uses.

Stripping quoted text to the relevant would be a HUGE improvement.


Some Mails arrive with quotations that are extremely hard to read,
due to lack of visual clue, like vertical whitespace and indentation
with quotation character.

> original comment 1
> [zz] comment 1zz
> original comment 2
> original comment 3
> original comment 4
> [zz] comment 4zz
[yy] comment 4yy
> original comment 5
> original sig
> [zz] 2nd sig


When the ratio new/quoted is small, then (a) stripping to the relevant
is often inadequate or hasn't been done and (b) explicit top or bottom
posting is preferable.

Suggestion to [zz]:
  - change your quoting style (quoting char, vertical whitespace)
  - did you really need to quote "original comment 2", "original comment 3"
    and "original sig"?

Suggestion to [yy]:
  - change your quoting style (quoting char, vertical whitespace)
  - did you really need to quote anything besides "[zz] comment 4zz" ?


-Martin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]