>>>>> "Tony" == Tony Finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> writes:
Tony> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, John C Klensin wrote:
>> FWIW, the thing that really irritates me is having someone
>> respond to a message after quoting only a few lines (often good)
>> but without supplying some clue that permits me to find the
>> message being replied to if needed. [...] or even using a good
>> In-reply-to field, [...]
Tony> Another example of Outlook's bad interoperability. I believe
Tony> that there was one release in which it implemented standard
Tony> message threading, but some bright spark decided to reinvent
Tony> the wheel badly.
Yes. And now we have 15 years of this bad behaviour.
My new financial planner had actually NEVER seen someone not top-quote, and
he actually thought his computer was broken, and couldn't figure out how
my text had moved. I do not think he realizes that you can even edit
the quoted text. He is less than 30, so literally, he has never used
anything else.
I've also been told that some organizations retain everything as audit.
(If they really wanted that, they should use message/rfc822, with an
embedded signature)
Such a nice social engineering hack on them to start CC'ing someone with
a made up "history" of some dispute, and claim it is true, alas, I've
never found a sufficiently interesting situation to bother trying it
out.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf