On 9/8/2010 3:12 PM, Richard Bennett wrote:
It seems to me that one of the issues here is that architecture models are published as Informational when they're clearly not in the same level of authority as most Informational RFCs. An architecture document is meant to guide future work on standards track RFCs, and has been regarded historically as more or less binding.
"...guide future work on standards track RFCs" -- yes. "...historically as more or less binding" -- no. Bob Braden _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf