Fedora Packaging
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Requires for "lower" version of packages
- Re: Co-maintaining packages - gdal, grass
- Co-maintaining packages - gdal, grass
- Re: Packaging-related changes in GNOME
- Re: Packaging-related changes in GNOME
- Re: Packaging-related changes in GNOME
- Re: Prefix for database add-on packages?
- Wish list sshdfilter maintainer
- Re: Prefix for database add-on packages?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Koji push failure
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Koji push failure
- Re: Packaging ada libraries
- Re: Prefix for database add-on packages?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Prefix for database add-on packages?
- Re: Prefix for database add-on packages?
- Re: Prefix for database add-on packages?
- Prefix for database add-on packages?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Packaging ada libraries
- Re: Updating our rpath guidelines?
- Re: Updating our rpath guidelines?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Updating our rpath guidelines?
- Re: RFC before update PHP Guidelines about PEAR package documentation
- RFC before update PHP Guidelines about PEAR package documentation
- Re: Updating our rpath guidelines?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Koji Error - Policy Violation
- Re: Koji Error - Policy Violation
- Koji Error - Policy Violation
- Re: Updating our rpath guidelines?
- Updating our rpath guidelines?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Updating rpath guidelines? (was: Re: Help with rpath issue)
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Appropriate values fot gitversion, gitdate from git clone?
- Re: koji build server install - DatabaseError: error 'ERROR: relation "sessions_id_seq" does not exist
- Re: koji build server install - DatabaseError: error 'ERROR: relation "sessions_id_seq" does not exist
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- koji build server install - DatabaseError: error 'ERROR: relation "sessions_id_seq" does not exist
- Submitted my first packages and need a sponsor #649662
- Re: Noarch package depending on an arch-specific package, how to handle it?
- Re: #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- Re: #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- Re: #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- Re: #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- Re: #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- Re: Noarch package depending on an arch-specific package, how to handle it?
- Re: #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- Re: Noarch package depending on an arch-specific package, how to handle it?
- Re: #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- Re: #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- Noarch package depending on an arch-specific package, how to handle it?
- #15 relaxing guidelines wrt. bundling
- Alternative plan for packages with bundled libraries
- Filled Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday November 3, 2010 - 1600 UTC
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: who should own /usr/include/X11 ?
- who should own /usr/include/X11 ?
- Re: pvfs2
- pvfs2
- Re: Packaging Reiser4
- Orphaning slock, gsql and fedorawaves-kdm-theme
- Re: Packaging Reiser4
- Re: Packaging Reiser4
- Re: Packaging Reiser4
- Packaging Reiser4
- Treatment of bundled libraries
- Re: Need feedback on what constitutes "unbundling" a library
- Re: Need feedback on what constitutes "unbundling" a library
- Re: Need help with requires
- Re: Need help with requires
- Need help with requires
- Re: Need feedback on what constitutes "unbundling" a library
- Re: Is Conflicts acceptable in this case
- Re: Is Conflicts acceptable in this case
- Re: Is Conflicts acceptable in this case
- Is Conflicts acceptable in this case
- Re: Help with update issue
- Re: Help with update issue
- Re: Help with update issue
- Re: Help with update issue
- Help with update issue
- Need feedback on what constitutes "unbundling" a library
- Re: Filtering Provides/Requires
- Re: Filtering Provides/Requires
- Re: Filtering Provides/Requires
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Filtering Provides/Requires
- Re: Filtering Provides/Requires
- Filtering Provides/Requires
- Re: About libtool usage
- Re: Packaging a postgresql cartridge
- Re: About libtool usage
- About libtool usage
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: Packaging a postgresql cartridge
- Packaging a postgresql cartridge
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- private-shared-object-provides in python packages
- Re: invalid ANT_HOME
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- invalid ANT_HOME
- Re: Access via gmane
- Access via gmane
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Macro %{optflags}
- Re: Macro %{optflags}
- Re: Macro %{optflags}
- Re: Macro %{optflags}
- Re: Macro %{optflags}
- Re: Macro %{optflags}
- Re: Macro %{optflags}
- Re: Macro %{optflags}
- Macro %{optflags}
- Re: Explicit Requires
- Re: Explicit Requires
- Re: Explicit Requires
- Re: How to configure a yum repo conf for installing from a local DVD?
- Re: Explicit Requires
- Explicit Requires
- Re: rpm and backward compatibility
- Re: rpm and backward compatibility
- rpm and backward compatibility
- Re: What is the upstream name of the python module refer to?
- Re: How to configure a yum repo conf for installing from a local DVD?
- What is the upstream name of the python module refer to?
- How to configure a yum repo conf for installing from a local DVD?
- Re: GConf2 scriptlet
- Re: missing makefiles for java-1.6.0-openjdk in git
- missing makefiles for java-1.6.0-openjdk in git
- GConf2 scriptlet
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday Sept 8, 2010 - 1600 UTC
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday Sept 8, 2010 - 1600 UTC
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- Re: Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- Re: Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- Re: Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Resigning from FPC
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Resigning from FPC
- Resigning from FPC
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting Summary - September 1 2010
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: How to install vim syntax files?
- Re: How to install vim syntax files?
- Re: How to install vim syntax files?
- Re: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora
- Re: How to install vim syntax files?
- Re: How to install vim syntax files?
- Re: How to install vim syntax files?
- How to install vim syntax files?
- Re: EXTERNAL:Re: FW: EXTERNAL: RPM and Version Control Systems
- From: Boyce, Kevin P (AS)
- Re: FW: EXTERNAL: RPM and Version Control Systems
- FW: EXTERNAL: RPM and Version Control Systems
- From: Boyce, Kevin P (AS)
- Re: ticket
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting Summary - Aug 25 2010
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Next FPC Meeting
- Re: Next FPC Meeting
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Next FPC Meeting
- Re: ticket
- Re: ticket
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: ticket
- Re: ticket
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: ticket
- Re: ticket
- Re: ticket
- Re: ticket
- Re: ticket
- Re: ticket
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- ticket
- Next FPC Meeting
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- RPM and Version Control Systems
- From: Boyce, Kevin P (AS)
- Re: F-14 build tree
- Re: F-14 build tree
- Re: F-14 build tree
- Re: F-14 build tree
- Re: F-14 build tree
- F-14 build tree
- Re: makeinstall macro still allowed?
- Re: makeinstall macro still allowed?
- makeinstall macro still allowed?
- Re: next FPC meeting?
- Re: next FPC meeting?
- Re: next FPC meeting?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: next FPC meeting?
- Re: next FPC meeting?
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: next FPC meeting?
- Re: next FPC meeting?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: next FPC meeting?
- next FPC meeting?
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal
- Guideline Draft for D programming
- Cleanup of packaging guidelines wiki
- Re: Guideline for D packaging
- Guideline for D packaging
- Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- gnome/nautilus filetype detection and default opening application
- Fwd: [Koji] Koji timing out (error code 110)
- [Koji] Koji timing out (error code 110)
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Upstream version strings with a hyphen
- Re: Upstream version strings with a hyphen
- Re: Upstream version strings with a hyphen
- Upstream version strings with a hyphen
- Re: pyx files?
- Re: pyx files?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: pyx files?
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- pyx files?
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- correct name for maven pom-file
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Guidline change never announced?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: Guidline change never announced?
- Guidline change never announced?
- Re: License tag for gpl2+ source and gfdl documentation
- Re: License tag for gpl2+ source and gfdl documentation
- License tag for gpl2+ source and gfdl documentation
- Re: Fast Moving Package updates (fldigi)
- Re: Fast Moving Package updates (fldigi)
- Fast Moving Package updates (fldigi)
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines
- Re: Documentation on request special rawhide tags
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: Documentation on request special rawhide tags
- Re: Documentation on request special rawhide tags
- Re: Documentation on request special rawhide tags
- Re: Adding a package to Fedora
- Re: Documentation on request special rawhide tags
- Documentation on request special rawhide tags
- Re: Adding a package to Fedora
- Re: Adding a package to Fedora
- Re: Adding a package to Fedora
- Adding a package to Fedora
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: pkgconfig as BuildRequires really needed?
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: pkgconfig as BuildRequires really needed?
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: FHS being ignored
- Re: pkgconfig as BuildRequires really needed?
- Re: pkgconfig as BuildRequires really needed?
- FHS being ignored
- Re: pkgconfig as BuildRequires really needed?
- pkgconfig as BuildRequires really needed?
- Re: Help with rpath issue
- Re: Help with rpath issue
- Re: Help with rpath issue
- Re: Help with rpath issue
- Re: Help with rpath issue
- Re: Help with rpath issue
- Re: Help with rpath issue
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Help with rpath issue
- Packaging kernel modules
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Arch-specific Requires
- Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc
- Re: Package dependant on kernel version
- Re: Package dependant on kernel version
- Re: Package dependant on kernel version
- Re: Package dependant on kernel version
- Package dependant on kernel version
- Re: version in package name with a number in the name
- version in package name with a number in the name
- Re: llvm case study: yum's handling of newly-converted noarch subpackages
- Re: llvm case study: yum's handling of newly-converted noarch subpackages
- Re: llvm case study: yum's handling of newly-converted noarch subpackages
- llvm case study: yum's handling of newly-converted noarch subpackages
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: binutils once more
- Re: cannot find -lsupc++ devel i686
- Re: cannot find -lsupc++ devel i686
- Re: cannot find -lsupc++ devel i686
- Re: cannot find -lsupc++ devel i686
- cannot find -lsupc++ devel i686
- binutils once more
- Re: Sponsorship model
- Re: Sponsorship model
- Re: Sponsorship model
- Re: Sponsorship model
- Re: Sponsorship model
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Sponsorship model
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Confusion regarding file location
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Confusion regarding file location
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Confusion regarding file location
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Confusion regarding file location
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Confusion regarding file location
- Re: Confusion regarding file location
- Confusion regarding file location
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Inaccurate information about LiVES package
- Re: Packaging-related changes in GNOME
- Packaging-related changes in GNOME
- Re: Config Files in Home Dir
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Config Files in Home Dir
- Re: shared-mime-info inconsistencies
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: shared-mime-info inconsistencies
- Re: shared-mime-info inconsistencies
- shared-mime-info inconsistencies
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Multiple license scenarios
- Re: Multiple license scenarios
- Re: Multiple license scenarios
- Re: Multiple license scenarios
- Re: Multiple license scenarios
- Multiple license scenarios
- Re: Config Files in Home Dir
- Re: Config Files in Home Dir
- Re: Config Files in Home Dir
- Config Files in Home Dir
- Re: How to build SRPMs for Rawhide from Fedora 12
- Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- Re: Adding a section on GSettingsSchema
- Re: Adding a section on GSettingsSchema
- Re: Adding a section on GSettingsSchema
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Adding a section on GSettingsSchema
- Re: Adding a section on GSettingsSchema
- Adding a section on GSettingsSchema
- Re: What is the category of a dictionary type software in desktop file?
- Re: What is the category of a dictionary type software in desktop file?
- What is the category of a dictionary type software in desktop file?
- Re: [fedora-java] How to build SRPMs for Rawhide from Fedora 12
- Re: How to build SRPMs for Rawhide from Fedora 12
- Re: How to build SRPMs for Rawhide from Fedora 12
- How to build SRPMs for Rawhide from Fedora 12
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- Re: whereis perl(ident) ?
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- whereis perl(ident) ?
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
- Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: create a wrapper installer
- Re: create a wrapper installer
- Re: create a wrapper installer
- From: Mohamed El Morabity
- create a wrapper installer
- Re: Close a review when no response from submitter.
- Re: Close a review when no response from submitter.
- Re: Close a review when no response from submitter.
- Close a review when no response from submitter.
- From: Caius 'kaio' Chance
- Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
- Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
- Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
- Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
- Re: [fedora-packaging] somebody who was sponsor , would u please help to review my package?
- Re: [fedora-packaging] somebody who was sponsor , would u please help to review my package?
- Re: [fedora-packaging] somebody who was sponsor , would u please help to review my package?
- [fedora-packaging] somebody who was sponsor , would u please help to review my package?
- Re: What is "definitive" Fedora Java packaging guide
- What is "definitive" Fedora Java packaging guide
- Re: Failed Dependencies while installing
- Failed Dependencies while installing
- Re: user input while installing an RPM
- Re: user input while installing an RPM
- user input while installing an RPM
- Re: Volonteering to own orphaned Java packages JLex and JDom
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Volonteering to own orphaned Java packages JLex and JDom
- Re: Volonteering to own orphaned Java packages JLex and JDom
- Volonteering to own orphaned Java packages JLex and JDom
- Re: How much time wait to finish a review?
- Re: How much time wait to finish a review?
- Re: How much time wait to finish a review?
- How much time wait to finish a review?
- Re: Discrepancy/error in package review guidelines
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Discrepancy/error in package review guidelines
- Discrepancy/error in package review guidelines
- Re: Wrong update pushed to stable
- Wrong update pushed to stable
- Re: Building EPEL Packages
- Re: Building EPEL Packages
- Re: Building EPEL Packages
- Building EPEL Packages
- Songbird -> Nightingale
- From: Kamisamanou Burgess
- Re: Packaging libraries
- From: Pau Garcia i Quiles
- Re: Packaging libraries
- Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- Re: make build fails with timeout
- Re: make build fails with timeout
- make build fails with timeout
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: Packaging libraries
- Re: Packaging libraries
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Packaging libraries
- From: Pau Garcia i Quiles
- Re: Packaging a noarch pkgconfig library?
- Packaging a noarch pkgconfig library?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- rpmlint clarification to guidelines
- Re: port opening and PATH modification in rpm spec file
- Re: port opening and PATH modification in rpm spec file
- Re: port opening and PATH modification in rpm spec file
- Re: port opening and PATH modification in rpm spec file
- Re: error running fedora-packager-setup
- Re: port opening and PATH modification in rpm spec file
- Re: error running fedora-packager-setup
- Re: port opening and PATH modification in rpm spec file
- error running fedora-packager-setup
- Re: port opening and PATH modification in rpm spec file
- Re: port opening and PATH modification in rpm spec file
- port opening and PATH modification in rpm spec file
- Re: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
- Re: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
- Re: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Nikto - Versioning change
- Re: Nikto - Versioning change
- Re: Nikto - Versioning change
- Nikto - Versioning change
- Re: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
- Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
- Re: packaging rpm
- packaging rpm
- Re: JOGL and Gluegen needs review
- Re: FESCo request: guideline about dependencies on redhat-lsb
- Re: JOGL and Gluegen needs review
- Re: JOGL and Gluegen needs review
- JOGL and Gluegen needs review
- Re: FESCo request: guideline about dependencies on redhat-lsb
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: FESCo request: guideline about dependencies on redhat-lsb
- Re: FESCo request: guideline about dependencies on redhat-lsb
- Re: FESCo request: guideline about dependencies on redhat-lsb
- Re: FESCo request: guideline about dependencies on redhat-lsb
- Re: FESCo request: guideline about dependencies on redhat-lsb
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: FESCo request: guideline about dependencies on redhat-lsb
- Re: FESCo request: guideline about dependencies on redhat-lsb
- FESCo request: guideline about dependencies on redhat-lsb
- Re: Suggested updated Java guidelines
- Arch-specific Requires
- Re: Thoughts for EPEL incompatible upgrades woes
- Re: Thoughts for EPEL incompatible upgrades woes
- Thoughts for EPEL incompatible upgrades woes
- Re: openssl-0.9.8m rpm build errors
- Re: openssl-0.9.8m rpm build errors
- Re: openssl-0.9.8m rpm build errors
- openssl-0.9.8m rpm build errors
- Re: Python Egg Guidelines for EPEL incorrect
- Python Egg Guidelines for EPEL incorrect
- Re: Impasse on packaging JOGL and Gluegen
- Re: Impasse on packaging JOGL and Gluegen
- Re: Impasse on packaging JOGL and Gluegen
- Impasse on packaging JOGL and Gluegen
- Re: Is class-path-in-manifest permitted when packaging a JAR file depending on a JNI-using JAR file?
- Re: Is class-path-in-manifest permitted when packaging a JAR file depending on a JNI-using JAR file?
- Is class-path-in-manifest permitted when packaging a JAR file depending on a JNI-using JAR file?
- Res: Help packaging Jogl/Gluegen
- Re: Help packaging Jogl/Gluegen
- Re: Help packaging Jogl/Gluegen
- Help packaging Jogl/Gluegen
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: fc13 RPM dep generator issue
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: fc13 RPM dep generator issue
- fc13 RPM dep generator issue
- Re: Next FPC Meeting
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Next FPC Meeting
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: remove source files
- Next FPC Meeting
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Complex Fonts Template Change
- Re: Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- Re: Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- Re: Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- Re: Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- Re: RPM for CPAN module - Issues with Provides:
- Re: remove source files
- Re: remove source files
- remove source files
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- From: Itamar Reis Peixoto
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- Re: Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- Re: Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- Re: Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- Re: RFC: /var/cache/<pkg> should be deleted upon package removal
- Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
- RFC: /var/cache/<pkg> should be deleted upon package removal
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Mention %{_sharedstatedir} difference on RPMMacros for EPEL
- Re: RPM builds and Vendor tag
- Custom content within -debuginfo packages for gdb archer
- Re: RPM for CPAN module - Issues with Provides:
- Re: RPM builds and Vendor tag
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: RPM for CPAN module - Issues with Provides:
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Placement of man pages
- Re: Placement of man pages
- Placement of man pages
- httpd RPM --with-included-apr configure option
- From: vivekanandan nataraj
- RPM for CPAN module - Issues with Provides:
- update-alternatives (and other such pre/post scripts) in multi-arch
- Re: RPM builds and Vendor tag
- RPM builds and Vendor tag
- Re: Python Guidelines Vote
- Re: Python Guidelines Vote
- Re: Python Guidelines Vote
- Re: CMPI plugins proposal
- CMPI plugins proposal
- Python Guidelines Vote
- Re: Broken URL in section on %global versus %define
- Re: RPM Group vs. Sugar
- RPM Group vs. Sugar
- Broken URL in section on %global versus %define
- Re: Placement of %doc
- Placement of %doc
- xpaint requires xpaint-devel
- Re: Usage of /var/db
- Re: Usage of /var/db
- Re: Usage of /var/db
- Usage of /var/db
- Re: Writeup of approved packaging guidelines
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Writeup of approved packaging guidelines
- Re: Item for FPC consideration - changelogs
- Re: Item for FPC consideration - changelogs
- Re: Item for FPC consideration - changelogs
- Re: Item for FPC consideration - changelogs
- Re: Item for FPC consideration - changelogs
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite Forum]
[KDE Users]