Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Wednesday May 12, 16:00 UTC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 10 May 2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:

> * Use %{_isa} to make hardcoded Requires Arch Specific:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ArchSpecificRequires

Two potential trivialish changes spring to mind:

- * A non-noarch -devel package depends on another -devel package.
+ * A non-noarch -devel package depends on another non-noarch -devel package.

- A non-noarch subpackage's dependency on its main package (Eg. libfoo-devel depends on libfoo).
+ A non-noarch subpackage's dependency on its non-noarch main package (Eg. libfoo-devel depends on libfoo).

...right?

BTW it would result in less broken dependency churn if packagers
would go through their subpackages (-devel in particular) that are
candidates for switching to noarch and did the switch before the MUST to
make deps to these arch qualified where applicable takes effect.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux