Le lundi 23 août 2010 à 18:03 +0200, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : > On 08/23/2010 05:51 PM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote: > > Le lundi 23 août 2010 à 17:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : > >> On 08/23/2010 03:30 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > >>> On 08/20/2010 08:35 PM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote: > >>>> hello, > >>>> i have do a ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/7 since 3 week > >>>> and i wait always! > >>> > >>> Jonathan, > >>> > >>> We're working on your ticket. :) > >>> > >>> One question that I have for you is this: > >>> > >>> In your template, you do not use %{d_libdir}. Why not? It seems to > >>> conflict with the rest of your draft. > >> > >> Slightly related to this question: > >> > >> Why do you need %{d_libdir} rsp. why isn't %{libdir} sufficent? > >> > >> Ralf > >> > >> -- > >> packaging mailing list > >> packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging > > > > > > because for feet with other distribution like debian ubuntu ... i put > > header file in /usr/include/d > > d_includedir makes sense (header), but libraries? > > d_libdir only makes sense if the libraries being produced by "D" are > incompatible to GNU/Linux system library file format conventions. > > Or conversely: The language a library in %libdir is being implemented > in, should be irrelevant. > > > Ralf oh sorry i read too quicly last time. I use _d_libdir for file /etc/ldc.conf who need D lib path -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
