On 08/23/2010 05:51 PM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote: > Le lundi 23 août 2010 à 17:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : >> On 08/23/2010 03:30 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >>> On 08/20/2010 08:35 PM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote: >>>> hello, >>>> i have do a ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/7 since 3 week >>>> and i wait always! >>> >>> Jonathan, >>> >>> We're working on your ticket. :) >>> >>> One question that I have for you is this: >>> >>> In your template, you do not use %{d_libdir}. Why not? It seems to >>> conflict with the rest of your draft. >> >> Slightly related to this question: >> >> Why do you need %{d_libdir} rsp. why isn't %{libdir} sufficent? >> >> Ralf >> >> -- >> packaging mailing list >> packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging > > > because for feet with other distribution like debian ubuntu ... i put > header file in /usr/include/d d_includedir makes sense (header), but libraries? d_libdir only makes sense if the libraries being produced by "D" are incompatible to GNU/Linux system library file format conventions. Or conversely: The language a library in %libdir is being implemented in, should be irrelevant. Ralf -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
