On 06/16/2010 06:44 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > Jason L Tibbitts III wrote, at 06/17/2010 12:37 AM +9:00: >>>>>>> "RD" == Rex Dieter<rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> RD> See tracking bug, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604169 >> RD> Seems an enterprising soul mass-filed bugs arguing packages placing >> RD> content under /usr/share/gtk-doc doesn't necessarily need to >> RD> Requires: gtk-doc >> >> Do the guidelines not already cover this case? >> >> "Multiple packages own files in a common directory but none of them >> needs to require the others." >> >> All of the packages should simply own /usr/share/gtk-doc. > > On rawhide > > # repoquery --whatprovides '/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/*' | sort | cat -n > > currently returns *206 packages* and making all of them own > /usr/share/gtk-doc/html must clearly regarded as a bug in the packaging > in the distibution Why? Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. > As /usr/share/gtk-doc/html is so common No it's not "so common", it's just one directory amongst many. Ralf -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
