On 05/10/2010 01:46 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> If there is something else that you feel should be on the agenda for >> this meeting, please feel free to let us know. > > I'd like FPC to decide and clearly state their Official(tm) opinion on > FESCo review of approved guidelines; it came up again in the thread-of-doom, > with claims both that FPC-as-a-whole wanted FESCo to review, and that they > *didn't* want FESCo review. Well, I want FESCo review. If the FPC disagrees with me and wants to vote on it, I'd be happy to let them. I think the fact that things have passed FPC, only to be reviewed by FESCo and found wanting (which then went back to FPC for revision and eventual acceptance) means that the procedure works, even if it is rare that FESCo find anything at issue with the FPC proposals. ~spot -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
