On 05/10/2010 01:14 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On 05/10/2010 01:46 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> >>> If there is something else that you feel should be on the agenda for >>> this meeting, please feel free to let us know. >>> >> I'd like FPC to decide and clearly state their Official(tm) opinion on >> FESCo review of approved guidelines; it came up again in the thread-of-doom, >> with claims both that FPC-as-a-whole wanted FESCo to review, and that they >> *didn't* want FESCo review. >> > Well, I want FESCo review. If the FPC disagrees with me and wants to > vote on it, I'd be happy to let them. I think the fact that things have > passed FPC, only to be reviewed by FESCo and found wanting (which then > went back to FPC for revision and eventual acceptance) means that the > procedure works, even if it is rare that FESCo find anything at issue > with the FPC proposals. > > ~spot > -- > packaging mailing list > packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging > Words right out of my mouth, but I'd definitely like to have conversation around it in the next meeting. -J -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
