On 1 June 2010 19:00, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2010/6/1 salsaman <salsaman@xxxxxxxxx>: >> I'd not heard of rpmfusion before, but if it's acceptible to Harry then I >> suggest we target builds for that instead of for for fedora itself. > > > If you are targeting rpmfusion, then the gst workaround I was trying > to suggest becomes less important as rpmfusion's LIVES can depend on > mplayer as packaged by rpmfusion even for theora. > That's fine with me. -- Harry Rickards - harry@xxxxxxxxx Vote Lib Dem - Building a fairer Britain - http://libdems.org.uk -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
