2010/6/1 salsaman <salsaman@xxxxxxxxx>: > I'd not heard of rpmfusion before, but if it's acceptible to Harry then I > suggest we target builds for that instead of for for fedora itself. If you are targeting rpmfusion, then the gst workaround I was trying to suggest becomes less important as rpmfusion's LIVES can depend on mplayer as packaged by rpmfusion even for theora. -jef -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
