On 08/23/2010 05:45 PM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote: > The only reason why i use _d_libdir si for ldc scan d library (only) > > But we can put all D lib in libdir > > see: > _________________________________________________________________________________ > $ cat /etc/ldc.conf > // This configuration file uses libconfig. > // See http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig/ for syntax details. > > // Special macros: > // %%ldcbinarypath%% > // - is replaced with the path to the directory holding the ldc > executable > > // The default group is required > default: > { > // 'switches' holds array of string that are appends to the command > line > // arguments before they are parsed. > switches = [ > "-I /usr/include/d/", > "-I /usr/include/d/tango", > "-I /usr/include/d/tango/core/vendor", > "-L-L/usr/lib64/d", > "-d-version=Tango", > "-defaultlib=tango", > "-debuglib=tango" > ]; > }; Seems pretty pointless. How painful would it be to have it simply put the libraries in %{_libdir} and never pass any -L? Will all D packages need to be patched to support this? Are they hardcoded to expect /usr/lib64/d ? ~spot -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
