2010/6/17 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Jason L Tibbitts III wrote, at 06/17/2010 12:37 AM +9:00: >>>>>>> "RD" == Rex Dieter<rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> RD> See tracking bug, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604169 >> RD> Seems an enterprising soul mass-filed bugs arguing packages placing >> RD> content under /usr/share/gtk-doc doesn't necessarily need to >> RD> Requires: gtk-doc >> >> Do the guidelines not already cover this case? >>> For from me +0.5 (not +1) for idea 3 .... and I see little value in creating > gtk-doc-filesystem only for purpose, because anyway packages in need of > /usr/share/gtk-doc/ all seem for development purpose only and gtk-doc > package is "not so large". > > So just make all these packages have "R: gtk-doc" seems the simplest solution. > > Regards, > Mamoru gtk-doc itself is quite small, but it will pull in a lot of other dependencies. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1993962 Chen Lei -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
