On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 01:57:37PM +0200, Martin Gieseking wrote: > Am 28.08.2010 13:12, schrieb Chen Lei: > > I suggest to split a vim-* subpackage like emacs addons, then this > > subpackage can depend on vim-common. Also, I think those vim-* > > subpackage don't need to depend on mainpackage since they work pretty > > fine without mainpackage. > > Yes, that's one of the (cleanest) variants I prefer. However, since most > packages usually provide only one tiny vim file, there might be > arguments against splitting them into subpackages, as discussed several > times before in different contexts. Thus, I was wondering whether Imho it is very annoying to have to install an extra subpackage only to get a syntax file. Therefore I am in favor of any solution that will install the syntax file at the same time the main package is installed, e.g. by multi-owning the vimfiles dir or changing vim to provide a vim-filesystem package. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpnO9fKPy8pM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
