On 03/17/2010 11:45 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:11 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> lsb-cert (a metapackage which requires half the repository and >> lsb-scripts) >> lsb-scripts (just the functions and scripts) >> >> It's also a good opportunity to drop the unnecessary "redhat" in the >> naming scheme. >> >> Thoughts? > > Would you then be making lsb-scripts require lsb-cert? Or would you > break that so that you can have lsb-scripts without the cert? Yeah, the intent is so that lsb-scripts no longer requires the whole pile of lsb-cert Requires. ~spot -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
