On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 09:11 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > lsb-cert (a metapackage which requires half the repository and > lsb-scripts) > lsb-scripts (just the functions and scripts) > > It's also a good opportunity to drop the unnecessary "redhat" in the > naming scheme. > > Thoughts? Would you then be making lsb-scripts require lsb-cert? Or would you break that so that you can have lsb-scripts without the cert? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
