On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:01:15PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Does anyone else like to add something? > > I've slept about this, and I'm starting to feel bad. If the autoqa guys > had blogged about such a test for static lib packaging, I'm sure there > would be a lobby who praises them. I think the your work is good and helpful. > This check of whether static libs are packaged correctly is automated, > including the tracking and closing of bugzilla tickets. In my opinion the > guidelines are clear [1], I've been responsive to answer early questions. > But apparently it's too easy to slam a door and hide somewhere. "binutils" > is not the only troublemaker. "e2fsprogs" has been reported two months ago > without a response. I understand the frustration this ignorance causes, but I guess this behaviour is a generic human problem, that probably every community of a certain size have to live with eventually. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgp2XBMu4DDis.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
