Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 02:26:52 +0900, Mamoru wrote:

> > There are dozens of -devel packages, which contain static libs only,
> > but don't provide a virtual -static package.
> >
> > What about OCaml?
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:OCaml
> > is not mentioning static libraries at all.
> 
> I am not familiar with OCaml but the above guideline says that
> "OCaml does not support dynamic linking of binaries".

Okay. Hopefully all of them are in the "ocaml-" namespace. I've extended
the package name check to look for "ocaml-" also in the middle of package
names, and that has closed two tickets.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux