Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There are dozens of -devel packages, which contain static libs only,
but don't provide a virtual -static package.

Many of them are OCaml (ocaml-*) and Haskell (ghc-*) packages.

The Haskell packaging guidelines contain a section that seems to suggest
that the packages need not provide a virtual -static package:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Haskell#Static_vs._Dynamic_Linking

What about OCaml?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:OCaml
is not mentioning static libraries at all.

What other exceptions exist?

-- 
http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/staticbugstat.html
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux