On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:29:45AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 29/09/10 07:25, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 September 2010, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> >> The way to filter this out is probably something like this:
> >> # we don't want to provide private python extension libs
> >> %filter_provides_in %{python_sitearch}/.*\.so$
> >> # actually set up the filtering
> >> %filter_setup
> >
> > I still think that related recipes in Wiki should be constructed so that
> > specfiles containing this stuff continues to work also on distro versions that
> > don't have those macros. For example the above could be written as:
> >
> > %{?filter_setup:
> > %filter_provides_in %{python_sitearch}/.*\.so$
> > %filter_setup}
>
> Or it could be encapsulated in a language-specific macro included in the
> python package, much like what is already done for perl, where the perl
> module spec files just contain:
>
> %{?perl_default_filter}
>
I asked this on https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/16#comment:2 but maybe
you can answer here instead:
What package is defining that macro and from what Fedora version? Do you
know if RHEL5/6 has it as well?
-Toshio
Attachment:
pgpQtW3MUbfRX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
