On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:54 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > It seems we lack any guideline about packaging these, which is not > that bad considering I could only find another cartridge in the repos, > postigis. > However, I'd like to hear your opinion about how to name the > subpackage; I guess candidates would be: > > 1- postgresql-rdkit > 2- rdkit-postgresql > 3- rdkit-pgsql > > right now I'm leaning toward 1- given that I found many instances of > 3-style packages providing optional pgsql support for "name" and 2- is > not very different from 3- Please use (2). 1 is used for PostgreSQL's core packages or core related packages. 2nd one is used for extensions, which is appropriate for what you say. Your Upstream Packager, -- Devrim GÃNDÃZ PostgreSQL DanÄÅmanÄ/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
