Thanks for your reply. There is no description for each patches.
Can you tell me what each patches in source rpm will resolve? Then only
i can adjust patches myself for successful rpm build.
On 03/07/2010 09:14 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> Its also important to note that any vulnerability in the upstream
> version packaged in Fedora may addressed via patches.
>
> On 3/6/10, Rakesh Pandit<rakesh.pandit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 6 March 2010 15:50, thirumalai wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have tried to build openssl-0.9.8m, i got some errors while applying
>>> the patch. I found many .patch files in rpmbuild/SOURCES/ directory
>>> after installing openssl-0.8.8k-5. what are the suitable .patch files
>>> for openssl-0.9.8m? How to build penssl-0.9.8m binary and source rpm from
>>> openssl-0.8.8k-5 source rpm? or Is there any source rpm for penssl-0.9.8m?
>>>
>>>
>> [..]
>>
>> These queries are sort of irrelevant here, still I will throw my
>> suggestions if they help:
>>
>> * In case you want to check if any builds are still available check koji[1]
>> * I could not find any builds available there for 0.9.8m
>> * So, in case you really need(for whatever purpose) 0.9.8m (which is
>> not latest available or was never build) you select of one previous
>> release available srpm is ok (In case 0.9.8k is previous version).
>> * You will need to adjust patches yourself based on 1) whether they
>> are needed 2) Whether they are already included upstream 3) Any new
>> patches for new needs specific to m version.
>>
>> [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/
>>
>> Hope this helps.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Rakesh Pandit
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rakesh
>> freedom, friends, features, first
>> --
>> packaging mailing list
>> packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>>
>>
>
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
