Its also important to note that any vulnerability in the upstream version packaged in Fedora may addressed via patches. On 3/6/10, Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 6 March 2010 15:50, thirumalai wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have tried to build openssl-0.9.8m, i got some errors while applying >> the patch. I found many .patch files in rpmbuild/SOURCES/ directory >> after installing openssl-0.8.8k-5. what are the suitable .patch files >> for openssl-0.9.8m? How to build penssl-0.9.8m binary and source rpm from >> openssl-0.8.8k-5 source rpm? or Is there any source rpm for penssl-0.9.8m? >> > [..] > > These queries are sort of irrelevant here, still I will throw my > suggestions if they help: > > * In case you want to check if any builds are still available check koji[1] > * I could not find any builds available there for 0.9.8m > * So, in case you really need(for whatever purpose) 0.9.8m (which is > not latest available or was never build) you select of one previous > release available srpm is ok (In case 0.9.8k is previous version). > * You will need to adjust patches yourself based on 1) whether they > are needed 2) Whether they are already included upstream 3) Any new > patches for new needs specific to m version. > > [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ > > Hope this helps. > > Regards, > > -- > Rakesh Pandit > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rakesh > freedom, friends, features, first > -- > packaging mailing list > packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging > -- Sent from my mobile device -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging