Re: Guidline change never announced?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/05/2010 03:44 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Back in June we had some discussion about directory ownership
> of /usr/share/gtk-doc(/html) that was caused by 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604169
> 
> While there was no consensus on the mailing list and most people
> suggested to close this bug, things look different in the wiki now. Spot
> made a draft at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Revised_File_and_Directory_Ownership
> and it seems like this draft has become part of the packaging
> guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging%3AGuidelines&diff=157103&oldid=157099

No, this is not the same thing. I wrote the draft last week, but the
guidelines change dates back to March (and does not address the gtk-doc
issue). That change originated from User:Notting/DirectoryDraft. It was
approved by the FPC and ratified by FESCo. It was announced in the
"[Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines 04/09 - 02/10"
email, sent all over the place on 03/03/2010.

My draft (Revised_File_and_Directory_Ownership) came from my
conversations on #rpm.org with the RPM upstream and various folks
involved in the gtk-doc discussion. It has not yet been considered by
the FPC or FESCo, but I am happy to take comments on it, as I do plan to
propose it in its current state.

~spot
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux